Content
Abstract:
This article discusses the issues of modelling the human centric lighting environment using computer graphics methods. Modern computer graphics programs allow for the calculation of spatial-angular distribution of luminance, a fundamental characteristic that shapes the visual perception of a scene. Richard Kelly, the founder of lighting design, states in his works that the main aspect of the comfortable visual luminous environment creating is the distribution of luminance in space. Analysing the spatial-angular distribution of luminance allows for a new stage in the evolution of assessing the quality of lighting in a simulated or real environment. By solving the task of forming a set of photometric parameters for human centric lighting (HCL) within this research, the possibility of designing a lighting installation for a specified lighting quality using computer graphics methods is demonstrated. The term human centric lighting refers to lighting that considers both the visual and non-visual effects of light on humans, starting from the visual representation of the environment and visual comfort, and extending to the impact on sleep quality, wakefulness, mood, and human behaviour. This article presents a lighting quality criterion based on spatial-angular distribution of luminance and a developed psychophysical scale, which together allow for the assessment of lighting quality using computer graphics methods.
References:
1. Bommel, W. Interior Lighting. Fundamentals. – Cham: Springer, Technology and Application, 2019. 2. Boyce, P. Editorial: Exploring human centric lighting // Lighting Res. Technol, 2016, # 48, pp. 101. 3. Werner W., 2014: Components, Controls and Networking: Environmental Challenges of Human Centric Lighting // LED professional Symposium +Expo 2014, September 30th to October 2nd, Bregenz, Austria. 4. Lu, Sh., Cai, Y., Shen, M., Zhou, Y., and Han, Sh. Alerting and orienting of attention without visual awareness // Consciousness and cognition, 2012, # 21, pp. 928–938. 5. Knez, I. Affective and cognitive reactions to subliminal flicker from fluorescent lighting // Consciousness and cognition, 2014, Vol. 26, pp. 97–104. 6. Babilon, S., Lenz, J., Beck, S., Myland, P., Klabes, J., Klir, S., Khanh, T.Q. Task-related distribution of luminances for Office Lighting Scenarios // Light & Engineering, 2021, Vol. 29, # 1, pp. 115–128. 7. Boos, G., Budak, V., Ilyina, E. Scaling of Sensations During the Performance of Visual Tasks in Relation to Human Centric Lighting // Proceedings of the Conference CIE2021, PO49. 8. Chih-Wei, L., Ke-Fang, Jung-Min, H. Specific lighting spectrum matching by normalized correlation coefficient and generalized reduced gradient method // 2014 9th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference (IMPACT), Taipei, Taiwan, 2014, pp. 470–472. 9. Cimini, G., Freddi, A., Ippoliti, G., Monteriù, A., Pirro, M. A Smart Lighting System for Visual Comfort and Energy Savings in Industrial and Domestic Use // Electric Power Components and Systems, 2015, Vol. 43, # 15, pp. 1696–1706. 10. Higuera, J., Hertog, W., Perálvarez, M., Polo, J., Carreras, J. Smart Lighting System ISO/IEC/IEEE21451 Compatible // IEEE Sensors Journal, 2015. Vol. 15, # 5, pp. 2595–2602. 11. Trivellin, N., Meneghini, M., Ferretti, M., Barbisan, D., Dal Lago, D., Meneghesso, G., Zanoni, E. Effects and exploitation of tunable white light for circadian rhythm and human centric lighting // 2015 IEEE1st International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry Leveraging a better tomorrow (RTSI), Turin, Italy, 2015, pp. 154–156. 12. Neumann, D., Stern, R.A.M., Isenstadt, S., Petty, M.M., Lambert, P., Addington M., Tanteri, M. The Structure of Light: Richard Kelly and the Illumination of Modern Architecture. – New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011, 224 p. 13. Budak, V., Zheltov, V., Notfulin, R., Chembaev, V. Relation of instant radiosity method with local estimations of Monte Carlo method // WSCG 2016–24th Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision 2016, Plzen, Czech Republic, pp. 189–196. 14. Kajiya, J.T. The rendering equation // Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH’86), 1986, Vol. 20, # 4, pp. 143–150. 15. Kalos, M.H. On the Estimation of Flux at a Point by Monte Carlo // Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1963, Vol. 16, # 1, pp. 111–117. 16. Keller, А. Instant radiosity // SIGGRAPH ‘97 Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 1997, pp. 49–56. 17. Cai, H. Luminance gradient for evaluating lighting // Lighting Res. Technol., 2013, # 0, pp. 1–21. 18. Saunders, J.E. The role of the level and diversity of horizontal illumination in an appraisal of a simple office task // Lighting Res. Technol., 1969, # 1, pp. 37–46. 19. Slater, A.I., Perry, M.J., Carter, D.J. Illuminance differences between desks: Limits of acceptability // Lighting Res. Technol., 1993, # 25, pp. 91–103. 20. Boyce, P.R. Human Factors in Lighting. – Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2014, 704 p. 21. Scheir, G. H., Hanselaer, P., Bracke, P., Deconinck, G. Calculation of the Unified Glare Rating based on luminance maps for uniform and non-uniform light sources // Building and Environment, 2015, # 84, pp. 60–67. 22. Budak, V.P., Zheltov, V.S., Meshkova, T.V., Notfullin, R. Sh. Evaluation of illumination quality based on spatial-angular distribution of luminance // Light & Engineering, 2017, Vol. 25, # 4, pp. 24–31. 23. Budak, V.P., Zheltov, V.S., Meshkova, T.V., Chembaev, V.D. A New Lighting Quality Criterion and its Approbation under Laboratory Conditions [Novyy kriteriy kachestva osveshcheniya i ego aprobatsiya v laboratornykh usloviyakh] // Vestnik MEI (Bulletin of MPEI), 2020, # 1. pp. 73–81. 24. Luckiesh, M., Guth, S.K., Luminance in the visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort // Illuminating Engineering, 1949, Vol. 44, # 11, pp. 650–670. 25. Luckiesh, M., Holladay, L.L. Glare and Visibility // Transactions of the IES. 1925, Vol. 20, pp. 221–252. 26. Epaneshnikov, M.M., Fan Zhi-Fyn. About the criteria for assessing discomfort [O kriteriyakh otsenki diskomforta] // Svetotekhnika, 1962, # 3, pp. 1–6. 27. Epaneshnikov, M.M., Ji Xiao-yang. Uncomfortable brightness of a single bright source [Diskomfortnaya yarkost odinochnogo bleskogo istochnika] // Svetotekhnika, 1963, # 4, pp. 1–6. 28. Boos, G., Budak, V., Ilyina, E. Scaling of Sensations During the Performance of Visual Tasks in Relation to Human Centric Lighting // Proceedings of the Conference CIE2021, PO49. 29. Budak, V. P., Zheltov, V. S., Meshkova, T.V. Experimental study of the new criterion of lighting quality based on analysis of distribution of luminance at Moscow metro stations // Light & Engineering, 2020, Vol. 28, # 3, pp. 98–105.
Keywords
- human centric lighting
- HCL
- spatial-angular distribution of luminance
- SADL
- quality criterion
- psychophysical scale
Recommended articles
Computer Graphics in Lighting Design: Course Work Results of Light and Engineering Students L&E, Vol.31, No.5, 2023
The Science of Light Engineering, Fields of Application and Theoretical Foundations. L&E 26 (3) 2018
Application Of The Photometric Theory Of The Radiance Field In The Problems Of Electron Scattering. L&E 27 (2) 2019