REVIEW

No

Title of the evaluation points of the manuscript

Yes

No

1.               

Does the article correspond to the profile of the journal?

2.               

Is the scientifical problem being solved clearly defined?

3.               

Is the method of research chosen correctly?

4.               

Have the author taken into account the latest publications on the subject of the article?

5.               

Has the author evaluated the results of the work and conclusions?

6.               

Does the title correspond to the content of the article?

7.               

Does the content of the abstract correspond to the results of the research?

8.               

Does the article comply with the requirements?

-          the volume of the article

-          keywords

-          references

-          formulas

9.               

Are the drawings and photographs correct?

-          quality of illustrations (high - low)

-          Is there a numbering for all tables and figures?

-          the availability of names for all tables and figures

10.           

What is the value of the work? (high - low):

-          scientific:

-          practical utility

11.           

Advisability of abbreviations:

-          text

-          figures

-          references

12.           

Evaluation of manuscript language

13.           

General assessment and conclusion on the possibility of publication:

-          requires minor refinement taking into account the comments of the reviewer

-          requires a major corrections and re-review

To the publication in the journal "Light & Engineering" is recommended

14.           

Comments and additional recommendations to the author:

(each answer "No" should be clarified by one or more comments) 

15.           

Additional information and considerations for the editors