Осаждение загрязнителей воздуха на остеклении может существенно повлиять на пропускание естественного света через оконные проёмы в зданиях в городских районах. Это исследование представляет собой имитационный анализ влияния загрязнения воздуха и коэффициента пропускания остекления на проникновение естественного света в помещения офиса открытой планировки в Лондоне. Вопервых, были разработаны и оценены прямые связи между коэффициентом пропускания остекления и условиями естественного освещения. Во-вторых, было разработано несколько простых алгоритмов для оценки потери естественного света из-за осаждения загрязняющих веществ на внешней поверхности вертикального остекления. Наконец, были разработаны некоторые выводы и проектные стратегии для сопровождения планирования фасадов на ранней стадии проектирования городского строительного проекта. 1. IEA (SHC Task 21/ ECBCS Annex 29) (2000). Daylight in buildings: a source book on daylighting system and components. Report of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available from: https://facades.lbl.gov/daylight-buildings-source-book-daylighting-systems [Accessed 10 July 2019].
2. Boyce P, Hunte C, Howlett O (2003). The benefits of daylight through windows. Report of Lighting Research Centre. USA. Available from: www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/daylighting/pdf/DaylightBenefits [Accessed 9 Nov 2011].
3. Chen X, Zhang X, Du J (2019a). Exploring the effects of daylight and glazing types on self-reported satisfactions and performances: a pilot investigation in an office. // Architectural Science Review, V64, #4, pp. 388–352.
4. Chen X, Zhang X, Du J (2019b). Glazing type (colour and transmittance), daylighting, and human performances at a workspace: A full-scale experiment in Beijing. // Building and Environment, V153, pp. 168–185.
5. Boubekri M, Cheung IN, Reid KJ, Wang CH, Zee PC (2014). Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: a case-control pilot study. // Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, V10, #6, pp. 603–611.
5.1. Borisuit A, Linhart F, Scartezzini J-L, Munch M (2015). Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood. // Lighting Research & Technology, V47, pp. 1–18.
6. Figueiro MG, Rea MS (2016). Office lighting and personal light exposures in two seasons: Impact on sleep and mood. // Lighting Research & Technology, V48, #3, pp. 352–364.
7. Tregenza PA, Stewart L, Sharples S (1999). Reduction of glazing transmittance by atmospheric pollutants. // Lighting Research & Technology, V31, pp. 135–138.
8. Sharples S, Stewart L, Tregenza PA (2001). Glazing daylight transmittances: a field survey of windows in urban areas. // Building and Environment, V36, pp. 503–509.
9. Watt J, Hamilton R (2003). The soiling of buildings by air pollution. In: Brimblecombe, P. (Ed), Air Pollution Reviews. The Effects of Air Pollution on the Built Environment. Vol. 2. Imperial College Press, London, UK. pp. 289–334.
10. BSI (British Standards Institution) (2008). BS8206–2:2008. Lighting for buildings. Code of practice for daylighting.
11. SLL (The Society of Light and Lighting) (2014). Lighting for the built environment: LG10: Daylighting – a guide for designers. Norwich. UK.
11.1. Ullah MB, Kurniawan JT, Poh, LK, Wai TK., Tregenza P A (2003). Attenuation of diffuse daylight due to dust deposition on glazing in a tropical urban environment. // Lighting Research & Technology, V35, pp. 19–29.
12. Mastekbayeva GA, Kumar S (2000). Effect of dust on the transmittance of low-density polythene glazing in a Tropical climate. // Solar Energy, V68, pp. 135–41.
13. Lanting RW (1986). Black smoke and soiling. In: Lee, S.D., Schneider, T., Grant, L.D., Verkerk, P.J. (Eds.), Aerosols. // Lewis Publisher, Chelsea, Michigan, USA, pp. 923–932.
14. Lombardo T, Chabas A, Lefevre RA, Verita M, Geotti-Bianchini F (2005a). Weathering of a float glass exposed outdoor in urban area. // Glass Technology, V46, pp. 271–276.
15. Lombardo T, Ionescu A, Lefevre RA, Chabas A, Ausset P, Cachier H (2005b). Soiling of silica-soda-lime float glass in urban environment: measurements and modelling. // Atmospheric Environment, V39, pp. 989–997.
16. Favez O, Cachier H, Chabas A, Ausset P, Lefevre R (2006). Crossed optical and chemical evaluations of modern glass soiling in various European urban environments. // Atmospheric Environment, V40, pp. 7192–7204.
17. Mardaljevic J (2006). Examples of climate-based daylight modelling. // CIBSE National Conference 2006: Engineering the Future, London, UK.
18. Reinhart CF, Herkel S (2002). The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distributions – a state-of-art comparison of six Radiance-based method. // Energy and Buildings, V32, pp. 167–187.
19. Philips GM, Littlefair PJ (1988). Average daylight factor under rooflights. // CIBSE National Lighting Conference, Cambridge, UK.
20. Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2006). Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. // Energy and Buildings, V38, #7, pp. 905–913.
21. Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z (2006). Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. // LEUKOS, V3, pp. 7–31.

• Предыдущая статья

• проникновение естественного света
• загрязнение воздуха
• динамическое моделирование
• офисы открытой планировки
• Великобритания