Content

Light & Engineering 32 (3) 2024
Volume 32Date of publication 06/13/2024
Pages 106–118
Abstract:
The current supply chain vulnerability has become a prominent factor affecting the stable development of the economy in various countries and is a significant issue with overall and long-term significance. This study constructs a network model to measure the vulnerability and identify key influencing factors in the LED lighting industry supply chain based on the entropy-CRITIC–ISM method. By reviewing literature and using expert interviews, an indicator system for measuring the vulnerability of the LED lighting industry supply chain was constructed. The relative weights of each evaluation indicator were determined using the entropy-CRITIC method, identifying the main factors influencing supply chain vulnerability. Based on the ISM model, the structure of the vulnerability of the LED lighting industry supply chain is revealed and presented in a hierarchical-directed topological graph. The results indicate that the ratio of key equipment suppliers from overseas, the spatial aggregation degree of the supply chain, the growth rate of LED lighting industry manufacturers, and the international market share of LED lighting industry products are deep-seated factors influencing the vulnerability of the LED lighting industry supply chain. The conclusions provide a quantitative method for objectively understanding the vulnerability of the LED lighting industry supply chain and offer specific policy references for filling the gaps and strengthening the industrial basic capabilities of the LED lighting industry.
References:
1. Huang, Q., Ni, H. Research on the enhancement of industrial base capability and industrial chain level based on the value chain theory // Economic System Reform, 2020, #5, pp. 11–21. 2. Li, T., Zhao, X.J. China’s exploration in safeguarding the security of industrial supply chains // Journal of Management World, 2022, Vol. 38, #9, pp. 31–41. 3. Song, H., Lu, Q. Innovation of supply chain finance model based on virtual industrial cluster: A case study of Chunjie Company // China Industrial Economics, 2017, #5, pp. 172–192. 4. Zhong, W. J., Mei, S., Fu, Z.N. Research on key core technologies and their tackling strategies-based on the industrial chain supply chain security and stability perspective // Journal of Systems & Management, 2022, Vol. 31, #6, pp. 1162–1168. 5. Shi, J., Lu, D. Research on enhancing the resilience and security level of the industrial chain supply chain // Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2023, #2, pp. 3–13. 6. Svensson, G. A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2000, Vol. 30 #9, pp. 731–750. 7. Wagner, S. M., Neshat, N. Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory // International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, Vol. 126, # 1, pp. 121–129. 8. Vilko, J., Lättilä, L. Analyzing supply chain vulnerability through simulation // Supply Chain Risk Management: Advanced Tools, Models, and Developments, 2018, pp. 107–122. 9. Jowitt, S. M., McNulty, B.A. Geology and mining: mineral resources and reserves: their estimation, use, and abuse // SEG Newsletter, 2021, Vol. 125, pp. 27–36. 10. Arndt, N. T., Fontbote, L., Hedenquist, J. W., Kesler, S. E., Thompson, J. F., Wood, D.G. Future global mineral resources // Geochemical Perspectives, 2017, Vol. 6, #1, pp. 1–171. 11. Baba, V. F., Wang, T., Adzani, S. A., Abdul-Hamid, Z. Information sharing and supply chain collaboration: strategy for higher firm performance in Ghana // American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2021, Vol. 11, #6, pp. 635–645. 12. Lagos, G., Peters, D., Lima, M., Jara, J.J. Potential copper production through 2035 in Chile // Mineral Economics, 2020, Vol. 33, #1–2, pp. 43–56. 13. Yevu, S. K., Ann, T. W., Darko, A. Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, Vol. 322, pp. 129093. 14. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Marcucci, G., Mazzuto, G. Fuzzy cognitive maps approach for analysing the domino effect of factors affecting supply chain resilience: a fashion industry case study // International Journal of Production Research, 2020, Vol. 58, # 20, pp. 6370–6398. 15. Gabor, A. F., van Ommeren, J. K., Sleptchenko, A. An inventory model with discounts for omnichannel retailers of slow moving items // European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, Vol. 300, #1, pp. 58–72. 16. Theerthaana, P., Sheik Manzoor, A. K. A signalling paradigm incorporating an Agent-Based Model for simulating the adoption of crowd funding technology // Journal of Simulation, 2020, Vol. 14, #3, pp. 169–188. 17. Lotfi, R., Nazarpour, H., Gharehbaghi, A., Sarkhosh, S. M. H., Khanbaba, A. Viable closed-loop supply chain network by considering robustness and risk as a circular economy // Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, Vol. 29, no. 46, pp. 70285–70304. 18. Vinogradova, M., Rogulin, R., Ermakova, M., Okhrimenko, I. Assessing the sources of uncertainty in supply chain management // Strategic Change, 2021, Vol. 30, #5, pp. 453–460. 19. Salim, N., Ab Rahman, M. N., Abd Wahab, D., Muhamed, A.A. Influence of social media usage on the green product innovation of manufacturing firms through environmental collaboration // Sustainability, 2020, Vol. 12, #20, pp. 8685. 20. Karmaker, C. L., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, S., Ali, S. M., Moktadir, M. A., Kabir, G. Improving supply chain sustainability in the context of COVID‑19 pandemic in an emerging economy: exploring drivers using an integrated model // Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, Vol. 26, pp. 411–427. 21. Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Ramayah, T., Hanifah, H., Kurnia, S., Mahmud, I. Supply chain information integration and its impact on the operational performance of manufacturing firms in Malaysia // Information & Management, 2020, Vol. 57, #8, pp. 43–56. 22. Hu, F., Liu, Y. Multi-index algorithm of identifying important nodes in complex networks based on linear discriminant analysis // Modern Physics Letters B, 2015, Vol. 29, #3, pp. 1450268. 23. Ngamwongtrakul, B., Phienthrakul, T. Identifying important nodes in scientific publications using co-authorship network // In 2016 Fifth ICT International Student Project Conference (ICT-ISPC), 2016, May. pp. 13–16. IEEE. 24. Xu, S., Wang, P. Identifying important nodes by adaptive LeaderRank // Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, Vol. 469, pp. 654–664. 25. Lotfi, R., Kargar, B., Rajabzadeh, M., Hesabi, F., Özceylan, E. Hybrid fuzzy and data-driven robust optimization for resilience and sustainable health care supply chain with vendor-managed inventory approach // International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2022, Vol. 24, #2, pp. 1216–1231. 26. Setyaningsih, S., Czakó, K. F., Vasic, T., Kelle, P. Cross-analysis of supply chain management drivers for small and Medium-sized enterprises // Polish Journal of Management Studies, 2021, Vol. 23, #1, pp. 352–369.
Keywords
Recommended articles