Content

Light & Engineering 32 (3) 2024
Volume 32Date of publication 06/13/2024
Pages 95–10
Abstract:
This study demonstrates the possibility of growing green walls in normal commercial building environments with lighting designed primarily for aesthetic reasons, rather than the promotion of plant growth. Lighting is a key resource required for the growth and maintenance of robust green walls within interior environments. The study evaluated the appearance and growth of green walls with electric lighting used primarily for aesthetic reasons. Three identical green walls with six different plants were illuminated using three different white LED light sources for a period of five months. Plant health was monitored and documented in terms of successful growth patterns. One hundred and six subjects appraised the appearance of the walls using questionnaires. Findings of this study indicate that it is indeed possible to grow and maintain green walls in normal commercial building environments with lighting designed for aesthetic reasons. Further, key species were identified as appropriate for growing on internal green wall setups.
References:
1. Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., Mador, M., eds. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life / John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. 2. Kellert, S.R. Nature by Design: The Practice of Biophilic Design / Yale University Press, New Haven, USA, 2018. 3. Culver, A.L., Mumford, J., Anderson, M., Fediw, K., Lewis, M. Living Walls: Communicating the aesthetic, environmental, productivity and health benefits of plants in the built environment, 2014. 4. Rodrigues, R. Biophilic Design: The (New) Hanging Gardens of Babylon / Love Happens, 2019, # 4. 5. Sharp, R., Sable, J., Bertram, F., Mohan, E., Peck, S. Introduction to Green Walls: Technology / Benefits & Design, 2008. 6. Hosey, L. The Shape of Green: Aesthetics / Ecology, and Design, 3rd ed., Island Press, Wash-ington, DC, USA, 2012. 7. Grinde, B., Patil, G.G. Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2009, # 6, pp. 2332–2343. 8. Kellert, S.R., Calabrese, E.F. The Practice of Biophilic Design, 2015. 9. Lei, Q., Lau, S.S., Yuan, C., Qi, Y. Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Biophilic Design in the Workplace for Health and Wellbeing // Buildings, 2022, # 12. 10. Largo-Wight, E., Chen, W.W., Dodd, V., Weiler, R. Healthy Workplaces: The Effects of Nature Contact at Work on Employee Stress and Health // Public Health Rep., 2011, # 126, pp. 124–130. 11. Adamson, K., Thatcher, A. Do Indoor Plants Improve Performance Outcomes?: Using the At-tention Restoration Theory // in: Bagnara S, T.R, A.S, A.T, F.Y (Eds.), Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., Springer, Cham, Florence, ITALY, 2019, pp. 591–604. 12. Raanaas, R.K., Horgen, K.E., Rich, D., Sjøstrøma, G., Patil, G.G. Benefits of indoor plants on at-tention capacity in an office setting // J. Environ. Psychol, 2011, # 21, pp. 99–105. 13. Bakker, I., Van der Voordt, T.J.M. The influence of plants on productivity: a critical assessment of research findings and test methods // Facilities, 2010, # 28, pp. 416–439. 14. Neuwenhuis, M., Knight, C., Postmes, T., Haslam, S.A. The relative benefits of green versus lean office space: three field experiments // J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 2014, # 20, pp. 199–214. 15. Wilkins, A.J. A physiological basis for visual discomfort: Application in lighting design // Light. Res. Technol., 2015, # 48, pp. 44–54. 16. Rogers, K. Biophilia hypothesis / Encycl. Br. (n.d.). https://www.britannica.com/science/biophilia-hypothesis (accessed September 1, 2021). 17. Sutton, R.K. Aesthetics for green roofs and green walls // J. Living Archit., 2014, # 1, pp. 1–20. 18. Canham, A.E. Artificial Lighting for Plant Growth // Light. Res. Technol., 1954, # 19, pp. 235–261. 19. Sekhar Darshan Panda, S., Kumar, J., Mohanty, N., Biswal, M., Baig, M.J., Kumar, A., Umakanta, N., Samantaray, S., Pradhan, S.K., Shaw, B.P., Swain, P., Behera, L. Comparative transcriptome profiling of low light tolerant and sensitive rice varieties induced by low light stress at active till-ering stage / Nature, 2019. 20. Ouzounis, T., Rosenqvist, E., Ottosen, C.- O. Spectral Effects of Artificial Light on Plant Physiology and Secondary Metabolism: A Review // HortScience, 2015, # 50, pp. 1128–1135. 21. Paradiso, R., Proietti, S. Light-Quality Manipulation to Control Plant Growth and Photomorpho-genesis in Greenhouse Horticulture: The State of the Art and the Opportunities of Modern LED Systems // J. Plant Growth Regul, 2021. 22. Weir, J. Artificial lighting fόr commercial horticulture // Light. Res. Technol., 1975, # 7, pp. 209–225. 23. Rodríguez-Gamir, J., Ancillo, G., González-Mas, M.C., Primo-Millo, E., Iglesias, D.J., For-ner-Giner, M.A. Root signalling and modulation of stomatal closure in flooded citrus seedlings // Plant Physiol. Biochem., 2011, # 49, pp. 636–645. 24. Westerduin, E. The Ultimate Guide to Living Green Wall Lighting, n.d. www.suiteplants.com. 25. Zielinska-Dabkowska, K.M., Hartmann, J., Sigillo, C. LED Light Sources and Their Complex Set-Up for Visually and Biologically Effective Illumination for Ornamental Indoor Plants // Sus-tainability, 2019, # 11. 26. Dugar, A.M., Dileep, M., Burhani, H. White LED Light Sources – Merging Architectural and Hor-ticultural Lighting Applications within Interior Environments // Int. J. Hortic. Crop Sci. Res., 2019, # 9, pp. 83–93. 27. Dugar, A.M., Raynham, P., Sexton, R., Gilbey, D., McKeever, R., Costello, M. Optimum LED Lighting for Green Walls // LED Prof. Rev., 2020, pp. 64–69. 28. ANSI/IES TM‑30–18: IES Method for Evaluating Light Source Colour Rendition, Illuminating Engineering Society, New York, NY, USA, 2018.
Keywords
Recommended articles
A Pilot Study Assessing Short-Term Chromatic Adaptation Preferences for Correlated Colour Temperature in India. L&E 27 (№1. 2019)