Light & Engineering 28 (1)

Volume 28
Date of publication 02/20/2020
Pages 70–78

An Empirical Validation of Estimation Model (OptimLUM) for Energy Efficient Luminaire Layout Design in Offices L&E 28 (1) 2020

Articles authors:

İlknur Erlalelitepe Uygun, Tuğçe Kazanasmaz, Serdar Kale

İlknur Erlalelitepe Uygun is Ph.D. student in Department of Architecture at Izmir Institute of Technology. She got her Master’s degree from same department in 2012. She is a research assistant in the Department of Architecture in İzmir Institute of Technology, Turkey since 2009. Her research topics are energy performance, architectural lighting and optimization

Tugce Kazanasmaz, Dr. of Philosophy in Building Science from Middle East Technical University (METU), Professor. She has 21 years academic experience in architectural lighting, building physics, and energy-efficient design. At present, she is a Professor in the Department of Architecture at Izmir Institute of Technology, Turkey

Serdar Kale, Prof. Dr., got his Master’s degree in Construction Project Management from HeriotWatt University, Edinburgh, UK, 1994. He held a Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering from Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, USA. His research topics are construction management, technology and innovation management, and performance evaluation. At present, he is a Professor in the Department of Architecture in İzmir Institute of Technology, Turkey

Abstract:

This study performed with the purpose of constructing and validating a model named OptimLUM (Optimizing Luminaire Layouts) to estimate the most accurate location, number and type of artificial light sources according to average illuminance and maximum uniformity in an office. OptimLUM is appling through Excel Spreadsheet to develop the model and uses Evolver, which is basing on genetic algorithm to implement optimization routine. To validate the reliability of the proposed model, luminaire layout scenairos generated for two types of luminaires after taking illuminance measurements in an actual office. OptimLUM illuminance values were comparing statistically with measurement and DIALux results to test the applicability of the model. The model performance is highly accurate in determining luminaire positions: coefficient of determination R2 and coefficient of variation CV were equal to (86–99)% and to (0.04–0.12) respectively, and for all scenarios. Its outputs are closer to the actual measurements when compared with DIALux outputs.

References:

1. Shikder, S. H., Mourshed, M. M., Price, A. D. F., “Luminaire position optimisation using radiance based simulation: a test case of a senior living room,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 2010.
2. Erkin, E. and Onaygil, S. An approach for calculating lighting energy saving potentials in the office buildings on the basis of LENI data // Light & Engineering, 2014. V22, No3, pp. 37–46.
3. Mourshed, M., Shikder, S., Price, A. D.F. Phi-array: A novel method for fitness visualization and decision making in evolutionary design optimization// Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2011.V25, pp. 676–687.
4. Zheltov, V.S., Budak, V.P. Mathematical simulation of lighting installations using a computer, Light & Engineering, 2017. V.25, No.2, pp. 113–120.
5. Cassol, F., Schneider, P. S., França, F. H. R., Silva Neto, A.J. Multi-objective optimization as a new approach to illumination design of interior spaces// Building and Environment, 2011. V46, n# 2, pp. 331–338.
6. Liu, J., Zhang, W., Chu, X., Liu, Y. Fuzzy logic controller for energy savings in a smart LED lighting system considering lighting comfort and daylight// Energy and Buildings, 2016. V127, pp. 95–104.
7. De Rosa, A., Ferraro, V., Igawa, N., Kaliakatsos, D., Marinelli, V., INLUX: A calculation code for daylight illuminance predictions inside buildings and its experimental validation// Building and Environment, 2009. V44, #8, pp. 1769–1775.
8. Rocha, H., Peretta, I. S., Lima, G. F. M., Marques, L. G., Yamanaka, K., Exterior lighting computer-automated design based on multi-criteria parallel evolutionary algorithm: Optimized designs for illumination quality and energy efficiency// Expert Systems with Applications, 2016. V45, pp. 208–222.
9. IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America IESNA), Lighting handbook reference & application, 2000.
10. Congradac, V., Milosavljevic, B., Velickovic, J., Prebiracevic, B. Control of the lighting system using a genetic algorithm. Thermal Science, 2012. V16, pp. 237–250.
11. CIBSE (Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers), Code for lightıng, Oxford, Butterworth- Heinemann, 2002.
12. Ferentinos, K. P., Albright, L.D. Optimal design of plant lighting system by genetic algorithms // Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2005. V18, #4, pp. 473–484.
13. Palisade Corporation, Evolver. 2013.
14. CIBSE (Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers), Office Lighting Guide LG7, Society of Light and Lighting, London, 2005. 15. Fontoynont M., Berrutto V. Daylighting performance of buildings: monitoring procedure// Right Light, 1997. V2, # 4, pp. 119–127.

Keywords

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33383/2018-052