This paper investigates and compares the photometric performance and lifetime cost effectiveness of LED and existing conventional luminaires (high pressure sodium (HPS) and metal halide (MH)). Photometric measurements of the lamps and the luminaires were performed at Yıldız Technical University Lighting Laboratory in Turkey. The performance requirements of the luminaires were analysed according to CIE (International Commission on Illumination) standards. In the simulations, HPS, MH and LED luminaires that provide good lighting criteria for designing M1 and M2 road models were compared in terms of a cost analysis. The life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) method, which comprises installation, energy and maintenance costs, was used in this study. The results of the LCCA showed that LED luminaires have almost the same cost effectiveness as HPS luminaires for the M2 road lighting class, and the total cost of LED luminaires is approximately 11.5 % less than that of HPS luminaires for the M1 lighting class. 1. IEA (International Energy Agency), “Light’s Labour’s Lost: Policies for energyefficient lighting,” Paris, 2006.
2. K. A. Avrenli, R.R. Benekohal, and J. Medina, “LED roadway lighting, Volume 1: Background information,” FHWAICT12–012, Illinois, 2012.
3. The Climate Group, “Lighting the Clean Revolution: The rise of LEDs and what it means for cities,” London, 2012.
4. Dubois M. C and Blomsterberg A, “Energy saving potential and strategies for electric lighting in future North European, low energy office buildings: A literature review,” Energy Build., 2011, Vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2572–2582.
5. E. Juntunen, E. Tetri, O. Tapaninen, S. Yrjänä, V. Kondratyev, A. Sitomaniemi, H. Siirtola, E. Sarjanoja, J. Aikio, and V. Heikkinen, “A smart LED luminaire for energy savings in pedestrian road lighting,” Light. Res. Technol., 2015, Vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 103–115.
6. J. D. Bullough, L.C. Radetsky, U.C. Besenecker, and M.S. Rea, “Influence of spectral power distribution on scene brightness at different light levels,” LEUKOS, 2014, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–9.
7. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), “Solidstate lighting program ‘R&D plan,” 2016.
8. L. Domenichini, F. La Torre, D. Vangi, A. Virga, and V. Branzi, “Influence of the lighting system on the driver’s behavior in road tunnels: A driving simulator study,” J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 2017, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 216–238.
9. S. Guo, H. Gu, L. Wu, and S. Jiang, “Energysaving tunnel illumination system based on LED’s intelligent control,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.,2011, Vol. 276, no. 1,p. 12164.
10. L. Tähkämö and L. Halonen, “Life cycle assessment of road lighting luminaires – Comparison of lightemitting diode and highpressure sodium technologies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 93, 2015, no. 1, pp. 234–242.
11. K. A. Avrenli, R.R. Benekohal, and J. Medina, “LED roadway lighting, Volume 2: Field evaluations and software comparisons,” FHWAICT12–013, Illinois, 2012.
12. FHWA U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Asset Management, “Lifecycle cost analysis primer,” Washington, 2002.
13. S. Onaygil, O. Guler, and E. Erkin, “Cost analyses of LED luminaires in road lighting,” Light Eng., 2012, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 39–45.
14. L. Tähkämö, A. Ylinen, M. Puolakka, and L. Halonen, “Life cycle cost analysis of three renewed street lighting installations in Finland,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2012, Vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 154–164.
15. Y. Jiang, S. Li, B. Guan, and G. Zhao, “Cost effectiveness of new roadway lighting systems,” J. Traffic Transp. Eng., 2015, Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 158–166.
16. T. Welz, R. Hischier, and L.M. Hilty, “Environmental impacts of lighting technologies – Life cycle assessment and sensitivity analysis,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., Apr. 2011, Vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 334–343.
17. CIE115:2010, “Recommendations for the lighting of roads for motor and pedestrian traffic,” Vienna, Austria, 2010.
18. IES LM54–99, “Guide to Lamp Seasoning,” 1999.
19. IES LM79–08, “The electrical and photometric measurements of solidstate lighting products,” 2008.
20. EN13201–3, “Standard EN13201–3 Road LightingPart 3 Calculation of performance,” 2013.
21. EN13201–1, “Standard EN13201–1 Road lighting – Part 1: Selection of lighting classes,” 2004.
22. CIE180:2007, “Road transport lighting for developing countries,” Vienna, Austria, 2007.
23. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), “LED Luminaire Lifetime: Recommendations for testing and reporting,” 2011.
24. L. Tähkämö, R.S. Räsänen, and L. Halonen, “Life cycle cost comparison of highpressure sodium and lightemitting diode luminaires in street lighting,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 2016, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 137–145.
25. R. Teodorescu and M. Katsanevakis, “An optimization method for designing large PV plants,” J. Photovoltaics, 2013, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 814–822.
26. State of Illinois Capital Development Board, “Life cycle cost analysis manual,” Illinois, 1991.
27. CBRT, “The Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.tcmb. gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/tcmb+en/tcmb+en. [Accessed: 12 Sep2016].
28. TSI, “Turkish Statistical Institute.” [Online]. Available: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do. [Accessed: 12Sep2016].

• Previous article
• Next article

• roadway lighting
• LED luminaire
• energy efficiency
• life cycle cost