The origin of the common type of overlap of the Armenian monastic fore-churches or narthex (zhamatun or gavit) – a stone muqarnas tent with a light oculus at the top – has not yet been fully disclosed. Denying the absolute autochthonous nature of this architectural idea, the author of the article develops a point of view about the transformation by Armenian architects of the form of a brick tent, known from the mausoleums of Muslim rulers, which were built since the 11th century in Mesopotamia and Syria. At the same time, the rich local context of the early forms of the high tent with an oculus and the architectural compositions associated with it are analysed anew. At the same time, in 1038 in the Horomos monastery the king Hovhannes Smbat Bagratuni has constructed the multi-column zhamatun with eight-side tent and an oculus. Intended for the repose of the king, this zhamatun could embody in its architecture both the forms of a residential building and, to a greater extent, the idea represented in Rotunda of the Holy Sepulchre. Since the second half of the 12th century, when many monastic vestibules were built, about a dozen such structures with a stalactite tent were also erected. It seems acceptable that in the process of creative processing of the idea of Muslim tents, Armenian architects embodied their formal features in the stone structure of the false vault, preserving the traditional light oculus for the local culture. Identified with the divine light, the stream looked spectacular against the background of a stalactite sculptural form resembling a cave. The key role in the creation of a new type of tent in the monastic buildings could be played by the masters of the Ani school of architecture.
1. Mnatsakanian, S. Kh. Architecture of Armenian Fore-Churches [Mnatsakanian S. Kh. Arkhitektura armianskikh pritvorov] / Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR Publ., 1952, 144 p., pp. 110–130, fig. 100–102.
2. Tokarskiy, N.M. Architecture of Armenia of the 4th‑14th centuries [Tokarskiy N.M. Arkhitektura Armenii IV–XIV vv.] / Yerevan: Armgosizdat, 1961, 388 p., p. 306.
3. Khmelnitsskiy, S. Between Arabs and Turks. Architecture of the Middle Asia of the 9th‑10th centuries [Khmelnitsskiy S. Mejdu arabami i turkami] / Berlin; Riga, 1992, 344 p., pp. 72–78.
4. Shukurov, Sh. M. Khorasan. Territory of the Art [Shukurov Sh.M. Khorasan. Territoriia iskusstva] / Moscow: Progress-Traditsia, 2016, 400 p., pp. 279–280.
5. Zakaryan, H., Hakobyan, R. On the Armenian Origin of Muqarnas Ceilings // Journal of Armenian Studies, 2016, # 2 (11), pp. 41–57.
6. Toramanian, T. Materials of the history of Armenian architecture [Toramanian T. Niuter haikakan tchartarapetutian patmutian] / Yerevan: ARMFAN, 1942, Vol. 1. 403 p., pp. 89–90.
7. Khalpakhchian, O. Kh. Civil architecture of Armenia [Khalpakhchian O. Kh. Grazhdanskoe zodchestvo Armenii] / Moscow: Literatura po iskusstvu, Publ., 1971, 248 p., pp. 67–69.
8. Khmelnitsskiy, S. Between Arabs and Turks. Architecture of the Middle Asia of the 9th‑10th centuries [Khmelnitsskiy S. Mejdu arabami i turkami] / Berlin; Riga, 1992, 344 p., p. 248.
9. Khmelnitsskiy, S. Between Kushans and Arabs. Architecture of the Middle Asia of the 5th‑8th centuries [Khmelnitsskiy S. Mejdu kushanami i arabami] / Berlin; Riga: Gamajun, 2000, 292 p., pp. 46–47, 117.
10. Tabbaa, Ya. The Muqarnas Dome: Its Origin and Meaning // Muqarnas, 1985, 3, pp. 61–74. doi:10.2307/1523084. ISSN 0732-2992
11. Ghazaryan, A., Ousterhout, R.A. Muqarnas Drawing from Thirteenth-Century Armenia and the Use of Architectural Drawings during the Middle Ages // Muqarnas, Vol. 18, 2001, pp. 141–154.
12. Kazaryan, A. Yu. Armenian-Muslim architectural correlations in the light of the medieval experience of architectural designing [Kazaryan A. Yu. Armiano-musulmanskie arkhitekturnye vzaimosviazi v svete srednevekovoi praktiki arkhitekturnogo proektirovaniia] // Questions of the general history of architecture [Voprosy vseobshchei istorii arkhitektury], Vol. 2. Moscow: URSS, 2004, pp. 46–54.
13. Kazaryan, A. Yu. New data on the cupolas of Ani’s churches. Part three. Stratigraphy of the tholobate of the Redeemer church [Kazaryan A. Yu. Novye dannye o kupolakh khramov Ani. Stratigrafiia barabana tserkvi Spasitelia] // Questions of the general history of architecture [Voprosy vseobshchei istorii arkhitektury], 2020, vol. 14, pp. 57–80.
14. Donabédian, P. Ani Multicultural Milieu and New Trends in Armenian Architecture during Queen Tamar’s Period // International conference “Ani at the Crossroads”, Ed. by Z. Skhirtladze (Tbilisi, 17–18 November, 2017), Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili State University, 2019, pp. 121–152.
15. Donabédian, P. Armenia – Georgia – Islam. A Need to Break Taboos in the Study of Medieval Architecture // Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LA3M, Aixen-Provence, France, 2020, pp. 63–112.
15. Alkadi, R.M., Gonzalo, J.C.P. Muqarnas Domes and Cornices in the Maghreb and Andalusia // Nexus Network Journal, 2018, no. 20 (1), pp. 95–123. doi:10.1007/s00004-017-0367-3. ISSN 1522-4600.
16. Fukami, N. The Use of Muqarnas in the Transitional Zone of Domes in Egyptian Islamic Architecture: From the Fatimid to the End of the Mamluk Era // ORIENT, 2017, Vol. 52, pp. 93–119.
17. Khalpakhchian, O. Kh. Civil architecture of Armenia [Khalpakhchian O. Kh. Grazhdanskoe zodchestvo Armenii] // Moscow: Literatura po iskusstvu Publ., 1971, 248 p., pp. 56–71, 92–95.
18. Bixio, R., Caloi, V., Castellani, V., Traverso, M. Ani 2004: Survey on the Underground Settlements / Oxford: Hadrian Books, 2009. 82 p.
19. Baeva O., Kazaryan A. On the ‘Glkhatun’ Type Cave Dwelling of Ani: Preliminary Research // Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Architecture: Heritage, Traditions and Innovations (AHTI 2022) (Athena Transactions in Social Sciences and Humanities, Volume 2). Athena Publ., 2023, pp. 95–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55060/s.atssh.221230.013.
20. Mnatsakanian, S. Kh. Architecture of Armenian Fore-Churches [Mnatsakanian S. Kh. Arkhitektura armianskikh pritvorov] / Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR Publ., 1952, 144 p., pp. 30–36.
21. Kazaryan, A. The Zhamatun of Horomos: The Shaping of an Unprecedented Type of Fore-church Hall // E-journal on Visual and Art History. Sektion Funun – Transkulturelle Perspektiven. Architectural Models, Mobility, and Building Techniques: Modes of Transfer in Medieval Anatolia, Byzantium, and the Caucasus, Edit. P. Blessing. 14 p., il.: URL: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/kunsttexte/2014–3/kazaryan-armen‑4/PDF/kazaryan.pdf (date of addressing is 15.07.2017).
22. Kazaryan, A. The Architecture of Horomos Monastery // Horomos Monastery: Art and History, Ed. by E. Vardanyan, Paris: ACHCByz Publ., 2015, pp. 55–205.
23. Vardanyan, E. The żamatun of Horomos and the żamatun/gawit’ structures in Armenian architecture // Horomos Monastery: Art and History / Ed. by E. Vardanyan. Paris: ACHCByz Publ., 2015, pp. 207–236.
24. Mnatsakanian, S. Kh. Architecture of Armenian Fore-Churches [Mnatsakanian S. Kh. Arkhitektura armianskikh pritvorov] / Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR Publ., 1952, 144 p.
25. Hillenbrand, R. Islamic Architecture / New-York: Columbia University press, 1994, pp. 308–311.
26. Muradov, R.G. Toward the question of form regarding the covering on the Argavand mausoleum, Armenia [Muradov R.G. K voprosu o forme pokrytiia mavzoleia v Argavande, Armeniia] // Questions of the general history of architecture [Voprosy vseobshchei istorii arkhitektury], 2017, Vol. 8, pp. 117–133, p. 128.
27. Mnatsakanian, S. Kh. Architecture of Armenian Fore-Churches [Mnatsakanian S. Kh. Arkhitektura armianskikh pritvorov] / Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR Publ., 1952, 144 p., pp. 29–30.
28. Cuneo, P. Architettura Armena dal quarto al diciannovesimo secolo / Con testi e contribute di T. Breccia Fratadocchi, M. Hasrat’yan, M.A. Lala Comneno, A. Zarian. Roma: De Luca Editore, 1988, Vol. 1–2, 926 p., pp. 646–647.
29. Kazaryan, A. The Architecture of Horomos Monastery // Horomos Monastery: Art and History / Ed. by E. Vardanyan. Paris: ACHCByz Publ., 2015, pp. 184–105.
30. Mnatsakanian, S. Kh. Architecture of Armenian Fore-Churches [Mnatsakanian S. Kh. Arkhitektura armianskikh pritvorov] / Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of Armenian SSR Publ., 1952, 144 p., p. 102.

• Previous article
• Next article

• Armenian architecture
• muqarnas tent
• oculus
• light stream
• Ani
• Horomos
• monastic architecture
• interaction of architectural traditions