Оценка и субъективное восприятие дискомфорта от блёских источников света зависит от диапазона предъявляемых стимулов. Этот психофизический процесс называется эффектом (влиянием) диапазона стимулов. 1. Parsons, J.H. Glare, its causes and effect // The Lancet, 1910, Vol. 175, #4508, pp. 234–236.
2. Holladay, L.L. The fundamentals of glare and visibility // Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1926, Vol. 12, pp. 271–319.
3. Wienold, J., Christoffersen, J. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras // Energy and Buildings, 2006, Vol. 38, pp. 743–757.
4. Luckiesh, M., Guth, S.K. Brightness in visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort (BCD) // Illuminating Engineering, 1949, Vol. 44, pp. 650–670.
5. Budak, V.P. Zheltov, V. S., Meshkova, T. V., Notfullin, R.S. Evaluation of illumination quality based on spatial-angular luminance distribution // Light & Engineering, 2017, Vol. 25, #4, pp. 24–31.
6. Hopkinson, R.G. Discomfort glare in lighted streets // Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1940, Vol. 5, pp. 1–24.
7. de Boer, J. B., Schreuder, D.A. Glare as a criterion for quality in street lighting // Lighting Research and Technology, 1967, Vol. 32, #2, pp. 117–137.
8. Schmidt-Clausen, H.-J., Bindels, J. Assessment of discomfort glare in motor vehicle lighting // Lighting Research and Technology, 1974, Vol. 6, #2, pp. 79–88.
9. CIE, Glare and uniformity in road lighting installations, Technical report n°31, Paris: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 1976.
10. CIE, Discomfort glare in the interior lighting environment, Technical report n°55, Vienna: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 1983.
11. CIE, Discomfort glare in interior lighting, Technical Report n°117, Vienna: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 1995.
12. CIE, Glare from small, large and complex sources, Technical report n°147, Vienna: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 2002.
13. CIE, Discomfort glare in road lighting and vehicle lighting, Technical Report N°243, Vienne: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 2021.
14. CIE, Review of lighting quality measures for interior lighting with LED lighting systems, Technical Report N°205, Vienne: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 2013.
15. Vissenberg, M., Perz, M., Donners, M., Sekulovski, D. Generic glare sensation model based on the human visual system // In Proc CIE Midterm meeting, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2021.
16. Girard, J., Villa, C., Brémond, R. Discomfort due to glare from a cyclic source in outdoor lighting conditions // Leukos, 2021.
17. Fotios, S., Uttley, J., Cheal, C., Hara, N. Using eye-tracking to identify pedestrians’ critical visual tasks, Part 1. Dual task approach // Lighting Research & Technology, 2015, Vol. 47, #2, pp. 133–148.
18. Fotios, S., Kent, M. Measuring discomfort from glare: Recommendations for good practice // Leukos, 2021, Vol. 17, #4, pp. 338–358.
19. Veitch, J., Fotios, S., Houser, K. Judging the scientific quality of applied lighting research // Leukos, 2019, Vol. 15, #(2–3), pp. 97– 114.
20. Parducci, A. Category judgment: a range-frequency model // Psychological Review, 1965, Vol. 72, #6, pp. 407–418.
21. Poulton, E.C. Bias in quantifying judgments // Hove, UK. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
22. Kent, M., Fotios, S. The effect of a pre-trial range demonstration on subjective evaluations using category rating of discomfort due to glare // Leukos, 2021, Vol. 17, #1, pp. 43–58.
23. Parducci, A. Range-frequency compromise in judgments // Psychological monographs, 1963, Vol. 77, #2, pp. 1–50.
24. Parducci, A., Calfee, R. C., Marshall, L. M., Davidson, L.P. Context-effects in judgments: Adaptation level as a function of the mean, midpoint and median of the stimuli // Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, Vol. 60, pp. 65–77.
25. Parducci, A., Perrett, L.F. Category rating scales: effects of relative spacing and frequency of stimulus value // Journal of experimental psychology: Monography, 1971, Vol. 89, #2, pp. 427–452.
26. Parducci, A., Wedell, D.H. The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1986, Vol. 12, #4, pp. 496–512.
27. Lulla et Bennett Discomfort glare: range effects // Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1981, Vol. 10, #2, pp. 74–80.
28. Fotios, S. Using category rating to evaluate the lit environment: is a meaningful opinion captured? // Leukos, 2019, Vol. 15, #(2–3), pp. 127–142.
29. Poulton, E.C. The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation // Psychological Bulletin, 1968, Vol. 69, pp. 1–19.
30. Poulton, E.C. Unwanted range effects from using within-subjects experimental designs // Psychological bulletin, 1973, Vol. 80, pp. 113–121.
31. Poulton, E.C. Range effects in experiments on people // American Journal of Psychology, 1975, Vol. 88, pp. 3–32.
32. Poulton, E.C. Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading // British Journal of Psychology, 1977, Vol. 68, pp. 409–425.
33. Poulton, E.C. Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude // Psychological Bulletin, 1979, Vol. 86, #4, pp. 777–803.
34. Fotios, S. Cheal, C. Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments // Lighting Research & Technology, 2010, Vol. 42, #4, pp. 433–447.
35. Krumpal, I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review // Quality & Quantity, 2013, Vol. 47, #4, pp. 2025–2047.
36. Boring, E.G. The stimulus-error // American Journal of Psychology, 1921, Vol. 32, pp. 449–471.
37. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases // Science, 1974, Vol. 185, #4157, pp. 1124–1131.
38. Kahneman, D. Nobel lecture // Stockholm, Sweden: Nobel foundation, 2002.
39. Simon, H. A. A behavioural model of rational choice // The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, Vol. 69, pp. 99–118.
40. Dehaene, S. The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics // Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.
41. Stevens, S.S. On the theory of scales of measurement // Science, 1946, Vol. 103, #2684, pp. 677–680.
42. Fechner, G.T. Elemente der Psychophysik // Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1860.
43. Stevens, S.S. On the psychophysical law // Psychological review, 1957, Vol. 64, pp. 153–181.
44. Piéron, H. Les échelles subjectives peuvent-elles fournir la base d’une nouvelle loi psychophysique? // L’année Psychologique, 1959, Vol. 49, #1, pp. 1–34.
45. Haubensak, G. The consistency model: a process model for absolute judgments // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992, Vol. 18, pp. 303–309.
46. Hoc, J.M. Towards ecological validity of research in cognitive ergonomics // Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 2001, Vol. 2, #3, pp. 278–288.
47. Fotios, S. An error in brightness matching associated with the application of dimming // Lighting Research & Technology, 2001, Vol. 33, #4, pp. 223–231.

• Предыдущая статья
• Следующая статья

• влияние диапазона стимулов
• дискомфорт
• блёскость
• психофизика
• методология