Content
Abstract:
Historic buildings pose challenges for daylighting improvements due to preservation constraints, however, improving their performance is essential for climate goals. This study seeks to improve daylighting performance, thermal comfort, and energy efficiency in historic buildings while maintaining their historic value through various design strategies, including glass upgrades, shading elements, and light tube integration, using a multi-objective optimization model.To analyse the performance of the model, two case studies from distinct climates, Mediterranean and Temperate Oceanic, were evaluated through Grasshopper plug-ins, Ladybug and Honeybee, and optimized via Octopus plug-in. A machine learning tool, Dodo plug-in was integrated to speed up the evaluation process and estimate simulation results while exploring a larger number of design alternatives.The optimization results reveal that daylighting strategies improved UDI up to 83.6 % and reduced ASE to 0 %, and improved TCP up to 6.73%, while energy use decreased by up to 8.81 % with shading and light tubes proving most effective in warm climates and roof windows in colder ones. The study confirms that performance-based design can enhance environmental efficiency without compromising buildings' historic values.
References:
1. ICOMOS. The Venice Charter-International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites, 1964. 2. ICOMOS. ICOMOS Charter – Principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage, 2003. 3. European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, 2020. 4. Troi, A., Bastian, Z., Eds. Energy efficiency solutions for historic buildings / A handbook, Berlin, München, Boston: Birkhäuser, 2015. DOI:10.1515/9783038216506 5. Bodart, M., A. De Herde, A. Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting // Energy and Building, Vol. 34, # 5, pp. 421–429, 2002. DOI:10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00117-7 6. Bakmohammadi, P., Noorzai, E. Optimization of the design of the primary school classrooms in terms of energy and daylight performance considering occupants' thermal and visual comfort // Energy Reports, Vol. 6, pp. 1590–1607, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/J.EGYR.2020.06.008 7. Brzezicki, M. An evaluation of useful daylight illuminance in an office room with a light shelf and translucent ceiling at 51◦ n // Buildings, Vol. 11, # 11, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/buildings11110494 8. Lo Verso, V. R., Fregonara, E., Caffaro, F., Morisano, C., Peiretti, M.G. Daylighting as the driving force of the design process: From the results of a survey to the implementation into an advanced daylighting project // Journal of Daylighting, Vol. 1, # 1, pp. 36–55, 2014. DOI: 10.15627/jd.2014.5 9. Nasteski, V. An overview of the supervised machine learning methods // HORIZONS.B, Vol. 4, pp. 51–62, 2017. DOI: 10.20544/horizons.b.04.1.17/p05
Keywords
Recommended articles
Architectural Lighting Design Evaluation of Izmir Ataturk Museum L&E, Vol.32, No.4, 2024
Examining Occupancy and Architectural Aspects Affecting Manual Lighting Control Behaviour in Offices Based on a User Survey . L&E 26 (2) 2018
Lighting Design for Elderly Living in Residential Care Facilities L&E, Vol.30, No.5, 2022