1. Katia, R., Rakha, T. Evaluating Annual Sun Exposure in LEED v4 for Commercial Office Buildings: Inclusion of Annual Glare to Enhance the Occupant Visual Performance and Comfort // LEUKOS, 2024, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2024.2405490 2. Hosenuzzaman, M., Rahim, N. A., Selvaraj, J., Hasanuzzaman, M., Malek, A. A., Nahar, A. Global prospects, progress, policies, and environmental impact of solar photovoltaic power generation // Elsevier, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2015, # 41, pp. 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.046 3. Goharian, A., Mahdavinejad, M. A novel approach to multi-apertures and multi-aspects ratio light pipe // Journal of Daylighting, 2020, 7 (2), pp. 86–200. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2020.17 4. Sharp, F., Lindsey, D., Dols, J., Coker, J. The use and environmental impact of daylighting // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 85, pp. 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.092 5. Spacek, A.D., Neto, J.M., Biléssimo, L.D., Ando Junior O.H., Santana, M.V.F.D., Malfatti, C.D.F. Proposal of the tubular daylight system using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (abs) metalized with aluminium for reflective tube structure // Energies, 2018, 11(1):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/en110101 6. Aizenberg, Y.B., Budak, V.P. The science of light engineering, fields of application and theoretical foundations // Light & Engineering, 2018, Vol. 26, # 3, pp. 4–6. 7. Budak, V.P., Aizenberg, J.B. The light field and the scope of light science // Light & Engineering, 2021, Vol. 29, # 1, pp. 4–10. 8. Zhang, X., Muneer, T, Kubie, J. A design guide for performance assessment of solar light-pipes // Lighting Research & Technology, 2002, Vol. 34, # 2, pp. 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782802li041oa 9. Tsang, E.K., Kocifaj, M., Li, D.H., Kundracik, F., Mohelníková, J. 2018. Straight light pipes’ daylighting: A case study for different climatic zones // Solar Energy, 2018, # 170, pp. 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.042 10. Mayhoub, M.S. Innovative daylighting systems’ challenges: A critical study // Energy and Buildings, 2014, # 80, pp. 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.019 11. Aizenberg, J.B. Hollow Light Guides // Znack Publishing House, 2009, 208 p. 12. Aizenberg, J.B. International activity in field of light and engineering: creative report // Light & Engineering, 2020, Vol. 28, # 3, pp. 4–9. 13. Mahawan, J., Thongtha, A. Experimental investigation of illumination performance of hollow light pipe for energy consumption reduction in buildings // Energies, 2021, 1 (2), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020260 14. Sharma, L., Ali, S.F., Rakshit, D. Performance evaluation of a top lighting light-pipe in buildings and estimating energy saving potential // Energy and Buildings, 2018, # 179, pp. 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.022 15. Shin, J.Y., Yun, G.Y., Kim, J.T. Evaluation of daylighting effectiveness and energy saving potentials of light-pipe systems in buildings // Indoor and built environment, 2012, Vol. 21, # 1, pp. 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x11420011 16. Salam Azad, A., Salman, M., Kaushik, S. C., Rakshit, D. Energy saving potential of tubular light pipe system with different colours on internal surfaces // International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2020, Vol. 14, # 4, pp. 793–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm‑12–2018–0001 17. Von Wachenfelt, H., Vakouli, V., Diéguez, A.P., Gentile, N., Dubois, M.C., Jeppsson, K.H. Lighting energy saving with light pipe in farm animal production // Journal of Daylighting, 2015, 2(2), pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2015.5 18. Jenkins, D., Muneer, T. Modelling light-pipe performances – a natural daylighting solution // Building and environment, 2003, Vol. 38, # 7, pp. 965–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360–1323(03)00061–1 19. Li, D.H., Tsang, E.K., Cheung, K.L., Tam, C.O. An analysis of light-pipe system via full-scale measurements // Applied Energy, 2010, Vol. 87, # 3, pp. 799–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.008 20. Garcia-Hansen, V., Edmonds, I. Methods for the illumination of multilevel buildings with vertical light pipes // Solar Energy, 2015, # 117, pp. 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.04.017 21. Darula, S., Kocifaj, M., Mohelníková, J. Hollow light guide efficiency and illuminance distribution on the light-tube base under overcast and clear sky conditions // Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2013, 124 (17), pp. 3165–3169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.09.052 22. Malet-Damour, B., Guichard, S., Bigot, D., Boyer, H. Study of tubular daylight guide systems in buildings: Experimentation, modelling and validation // Energy and buildings, 2016, # 129, pp. 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.019 23. Garcia Hansen, V., Edmonds, I. Natural illumination of deep-plan office buildings: light pipe strategies // In ISES Solar World Congress 2003. 24. Mohelnikova. J.,, Vajkay F. Study of tubular light guides illuminance simulations // Leukos, 2009, 5 (4), pp. 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1582/LEUKOS.2008.05.04.001 25. Carter, D. LRT Digest 2 Tubular daylight guidance systems // Lighting Research & Technology, 2014, Vol. 46, # 4, pp. 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153514526081 26. Baglivo, C., Bonomolo, M., Beccali, M., Congedo, P.M. Sizing analysis of interior lighting using tubular daylighting devices // Energy Procedia, 2017, 126, pp. 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.138 27. Baglivo, C., Bonomolo, M., Congedo, P.M. Modelling of light pipes for the optimal disposition in buildings. Energies, 2019, 12(22):4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12224323 28. Kocifaj, M., Kundracik, F., Darula, S., Kittler, R. Availability of luminous flux below a bended lightpipe: design modelling under optimal daylight conditions // Solar Energy, 2012, 86(9), pp. 2753–2761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.017 29. CIE 2006. CIE‑173 Technical Report: Tubular Daylight Guidance Systems. Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.25039/tr.173.2006 30. Kocifaj. M., Kundracik, F., Darula, S., Kittler, R. Theoretical solution for light transmission of a bended hollow light guide // Solar Energy, 2010, 84(8), pp. 1422–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.05.002 31. Wang, C., Gao, Q., Gao, W., Ouyang, J. Discussion about calculation method of light transmission efficiencies of elbows in cylindrical light pipes // Solar Energy, 2022, 238, pp. 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.04.024 32. Samuhatananon, S., Chirarattananon, S., Chirarattananon, P. An experimental and analytical study of transmission of daylight through circular light pipes // Leukos, 2011, 7 (4), pp. 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2011.10732147 33. Jenkins, D., Muneer, T., Kubie, J. A design tool for predicting the performances of light pipes // Energy and buildings, 2005, Vol. 37, # 5, pp. 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.09.014 34. Carter, D.J. Tubular guidance systems for daylight: UK case studies // Building Research & Information, 2008, 36 (5), pp. 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801987855 35. Kocifaj, M., Darula. S., Kittler, R. HOLIGILM: Hollow light guide interior illumination method – An analytic calculation approach for cylindrical light-tubes // Solar energy, 2008, 82 (3), pp. 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2007.07.003 36. Verso, V.R.L., Pellegrino, A., Serra, V. Light transmission efficiency of daylight guidance systems: An assessment approach based on simulations and measurements in a sun/sky simulator // Solar Energy, 2011, 85 (11), pp. 2789–2801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.08.017 37. Solatube, 2024a. Tubular Skylight. [accessed 2024 June 12] https://solatube.com/residential/tubular-skylights/. 38. Monodraught, 2024a. Sunpipe. [accessed 2024 June 12], from https://www.monodraught.com/products/natural-lighting. 39. Atalay, F., Kurtay, C. Daylight Performance of Elbow Geometry in Light Pipe Models // Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 2023, 54 (3), pp. 207–214. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.22503 40. Rahmani, Asl. M., Zarrinmehr, S., Yan, W. Towards BIM-based parametric building energy performance optimization // In Proc. of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, Cambridge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2013.101 41. Grasshopper, 2024. Grasshopper, Algorithmic Modelling for Rhino. [accessed 2023 June 12]. https://www.grasshopper3d.com/. 42. Roudsari, M.S., Pak, M. Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design // 2013, https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2013.249 43. Pilechiha, P., Mahdavinejad, M., Rahimian, F.P., Carnemolla, P., Seyedzadeh, S. Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency // Applied Energy, 2019, # 261, p. 114356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356 44. Kharvari, F. An empirical validation of daylighting tools: Assessing radiance parameters and simulation settings in Ladybug and Honeybee against field measurements // Solar Energy, 2020, 207, pp. 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.054 45. Shirzadnia, Z., Goharian A, Mahdavinejad M. Designerly approach to skylight configuration based on daylight performance; Toward a novel optimization process. Energy and Buildings, 2023, 286, p. 112970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112970 46. Reinhart, C., Breton, P. F. 2009. Experimental validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and DAYSIM 3.0 // Leukos, 2009, 6 (1), pp. 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1582/leukos.2009.06.01001 47. Ladybug. 2024a. EPWMap. [accessed 2023 June 12] https://www.ladybug.tools/epwmap/. 48. Ladybug. 2024b. Point-in-time Grid Based. [accessed 2024 June 1] https://docs.ladybug.tools/hb-radiance-primer/components/3_recipes/point-intime_grid-based. 49. IES. 2011. The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. The Lighting Handbook 10th Edition, Reference and Application. IESNA,1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365782807079518
More