Content
Number of images - 4
Tables and charts - 3
Conducting a Subjective Natural Experiment to Assess the Quality of the Internal Microclimate in Premises L&E, Vol.33, No.6, 2025

Light & Engineering 33 (6) 2025

Volume 33
Date of publication 12/11/2025
Pages 13–18

Purchase PDF - ₽600

Conducting a Subjective Natural Experiment to Assess the Quality of the Internal Microclimate in Premises L&E, Vol.33, No.6, 2025
Articles authors:
Sergey V. Stetsky, Kira O. Larionova, Majed Khalil

Sergey V. Stetsky, Ph. D., Associate Professor of the chair Architectural Design and Environmental Physics of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. He graduated from Moscow Civil Engineering Institute in 1970, faculty of Industrial and Civil Construction. He has 50 years of experience in higher education in this field and in scientific studies on Building Physics and Environmental Design

Kira O. Larionova, Ph. D., Associate Professor of the chair Architectural Design and Environmental Physics of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. She graduated from Moscow State University of Civil Engineering in 2009, institute of Construction and Architecture. Her research spheres: designing a comfortable environment, daylighting, and solar protection

Majed Khalil is a postgraduate student of the chair Architectural Department of Architectural and Structural Design and Environmental Physics of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

Abstract:
The article is devoted to the description of a natural experiment to assess the comfort of the internal microclimate in the premises of a residential building using the method of subjective expert assessment in the conditions of the hot and sunny climate of Syria.
The current popularity of the subjective assessment method is noted, since it is a real test of the conclusions that are given in the process of objective experimental studies.
The article describes the preparatory stage of the experiment, the process of selecting observations, forming a questionnaire, the results obtained and the conclusions made. The assessment scale used by observers is also noted. The history of the development and improvement of the method of subjective expert assessment is analysed and variant methods of its application are described. Based on the results of the experiment, a number of conclusions are made, which are used by the authors along with the conclusions obtained during the objective stage of the experiment on a real object.
The main conclusion is made about the relevance of the subjective expert method of research, as a result of which various aspects are revealed that were not taken into account in the course of the objective experiment conducted earlier. The subjective stage covered a larger range of issues related to the comfort of the internal microclimate. In particular, in addition to the quality of the light environment, the issues of insolation and sun protection and the psychological connection of observers with the external environment through window openings were also considered. Further, in the following studies it is planned to identify, by means of a comparative analysis, the correspondence of the conclusions obtained as a result of two full-scale experiments (objective and subjective) to each other and to make new, final conclusions. So far, it can only be stated that the subjective expert assessment reveals many new nuances that are not taken into account in the full-scale objective experiment, which should be specified in new studies continuing the ones considered.
References:
1. Solovyov, A.K., Stetsky, S.V., Muraviova, N.A. Comfortable light environment under natural and combined lighting. Determination of its characteristics by the method of subjective expert assessments [Komfortnaya svetovaya sreda pri yestestvennom i sovmeshchyonnom osveshchenii. Opredelenie yeyo kharakteristik metodom subektivnikh ekspertnikh otsenok] // Svetotekhnika, 2018, # 3, pp. 32–37.
2. Hopkinson, R.G., Longmore, J. The permanent supplementary artificial lighting of interiors // Trans. Illum. Eng. Soc. (London), 1959, Vol. 24, # 3, p. 121.
3. Hopkinson, R.G. Architectural physics: Lighting // London: HMSO, 1963, 360 p.
4. Semenikhin, N.I. Subjective assessment of the quality of lighting installations of reflected light [Subektivnaya otsenka kachestva osvetitelnikh ustanovok otrazhyonnogo sveta] // Moscow, NIISF, Proceedings of the Institute: Building Lighting Engineering, 1975, # 13, pp. 116–121.
5. Stetsky, S.V., Lobatovkina, Ye.G. Perfection of the method of subjective expert evaluation of the factors of the internal microclimate [Sovershenstvovanie metoda subektivnoi ekspertnoi otsenki faktorov vnutrennego mikroklimata] // Industrial and civil construction, 2013, # 12, pp. 69–72.
6. Ne’eman, E., Hopkinson, R.G. Critical Minimum Acceptable Window Size: A Study of Window Design and Provision of a View // Lighting Research and Technology, 1970, Vol. 2, # 1, pp. 17–27.
7. Lay, S.D. Appraisal of the visual Environment // IES Lighting Review, 1970, October, pp. 129–138.
8. Solovyov, A.K., Stetsky, S.V. Creating a comfortable light environment in classrooms [Sozdanie komfortnoi svetovoi sredi v uchebnikh auditoriyakh] // Collection of special and scientific works of the Polytechnic Institute of Brno (Czechoslovakia), 1979, pp. 113–124.
9. Stetsky, S.V. Subjective appraisal of the quality parameters of combined lighting [Subektivnaya otsenka kachestvennikh parametrov sovmeshchyonnogo osveshcheniya] // Architectural education. Intercollegiate collection of the Moscow Architectural Institute, 1979, 206 p.
10. Solovyov, A.K., Stetsky, S.V. Determination of the parameters of combined lighting by subjective appraisal of the light environment in the premises [Opredelenie parametrov sovmeshchyonnogo osveshcheniya po subektivnim otsenkam svetovoi sredi v pomeshchenii] // Designing and Scientific Research, 1984, # 6, pp. 36–38.
11. Stetsky, S.V., Porublev, S.A. Subjective appraisal of the light environment in the work shops of small auto repair enterprises for the climatic conditions of the North Caucasus [Subektivnaya otsenka svetovoi sredi v rabochikh pomeshcheniyakh malikh avtoremontnikh predpriyatii dlya klimaticheskikh uslovii Severnogo Kavkaza] //Industrial and civil construction, 2011, # 1, pp. 46–48.
12. Helson, H. Adaptation Level Theory: An experimental and Systematic Approach to Bechaviour / New York: Harper and Row, 1964, 732 p.
13. Report of the CIE No. 19. A recommended method for appraisal aspects of lighting associated with visual perception // Washington – London, 1971.
14. Stetsky, S.V., Majed, KH., Tushova, E.D. Conducting scientific lighting research on a real object in the hot sunny climate of Syria [Provedenie nauchnikh svetotekhnicheskikh issledovanii na realnom obekte v usloviyakh zharkogo solnechnogo klimata Sirii] // Economics of construction, 2024, # 4, pp. 189–193.
15. Muraviova, N. A., Soloviev, A. K., Stetsky, S.V. Comfort light environment under natural and combined lighting: method of their characteristics definition with subjective expert appraisal using // Light & Engineering, 2018, Vol. 26, # 3, pp. 124–131.
16. Molchina, N. A., Magera, T.N. Daylight quality assessment of rooms with lateral daylighting by the room light saturation criterion // Light & Engineering, 2023, Vol. 31, # 6, pp. 29–34.
Keywords

Buy

Recommended articles