Content

Light & Engineering 32 (6) 2024
Volume 32Date of publication 12/12/2024
Pages 17–28
Abstract:
With the development of technology and the emergence of the necessity to adapt to variable environmental conditions, kinetic systems have gained importance in architecture. Especially in the last decades, the need for a transformable, adaptable, dynamic architecture has increased. According to research, kinetic facades positively affect the environmental performance of buildings. Daylight is a natural force that can change depending on the movement of the sun. A fixed shading element is effective only at certain times of the day, but a kinetic element can respond to varying environmental conditions. Using such systems is important to achieve better daylighting performance. In this article, the proposed kinetic facade is tested to determine the type required for a secondary facade element that is planned to be applied to a facade of a university building in Izmir. The aim of this research is to investigate the effect of using kinetic facades daylighting performance with simulation method using Rhino/Grasshopper and its add-ons. This research will be examined in three parts: analysis of existing situation, simulation of the proposed kinetic facade, and evaluation and discussion of simulation results. As a result of the analysis, it is expected to find the result that kinetic systems improve the environmental performance of the building. In addition, it will be determined to what extent the level of openness of the kinetic facades affects the building performance. In this study also proposes a systematic approach for kinetic facades to test indoor daylighting performance, establish daylight assessment and improvement.
References:
1. Alotaibi, F. The role of kinetic envelopes to improve energy performance in buildings // Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 2015, Vol. 4, # 3, pp. 149–153. 2. Stevenson, CM. Morphological principles: current kinetic architectural structures // Adaptive architecture, 2011, pp. 1–12. 3. Zuk, W., Clark, RH. Kinetic architecture // Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1970. 4. Haeusler, M. Media Facades-History, Technology, Content // Avedition, 2009. 5. Ahmed, M., Abdel-Rahman, A., Bady, M., Mahrous, EK. The thermal performance of residential building integrated with adaptive kinetic shading system // International Energy Journal, 2016, Vol. 16, # 3, pp. 97–106. 6. Ibrahim, JA., Alibaba, HZ. Kinetic Facade as a Tool for Energy Efficiency // International Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews, 2019, Vol. 7, # 4, pp. 1–7. 7. Ayyappan, KL., Kumari, RM. Review on the application of kinetic architecture in building facades // International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2018, Vol. 5, # 8, pp. 1726–1743. 8. Fox, M., Kemp, M. Interactive Architecture // Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. 9. Kensek, K., Hansanuwat, R. Environment control systems for sustainable design: a methodology for testing, simulating, and comparing kinetic facade systems // Journal of Creative Sustainable Architecture & Built Environment, 2011, Vol. 1, # 11, pp. 27–46. 10. Shen, YT., Lu, PW. The development of kinetic facade units with BIM-based active control system for the adaptive building energy performance service // International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA, 2016, pp. 517–26. 11. Fox, MA., Yeh, BP. Intelligent kinetic systems in architecture // Managing Interactions in Smart Environments: 1st International Workshop on Managing Interactions in Smart Environments (MANSE’99) Springer, 2000, pp. 91–103. 12. Hoberman, C., Happold, B. Adaptive Building Initiative. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2024 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.adaptivebuildings.com 13. Hosseini, SM., Mohammadi, M., Rosemann, A., Schröder, T., Lichtenberg, J. A morphological approach for kinetic facade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort // Build Environment, 2019, Vol. 153, pp. 186–204. 14. Ben Bacha, C., Bourbia, F. Effect of kinetic facades on energy efficiency in office buildings-hot dry climates // 11th Conference on Advanced Building Skins,2016, pp. 458–468. 15. Grobman, YJ., Capeluto, IG., Austern, G. External shading in buildings: comparative analysis of daylighting performance in static and kinetic operation scenarios // Architectural Science Review, 2017, Vol. 60, # 2, pp. 126–36. 16. Wang, J., Beltrán, LO., Kim, J. From static to kinetic: A review of acclimated kinetic building envelopes // World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF, 2012, pp. 1–8. 17. Karanouh, A, Kerber, E. Innovations in dynamic architecture // Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 2015, Vol. 3, # 2, pp. 185–221. 18. Bakr, AO. Kinetic Facades The new paradigm shift in architecture Toward an Environmental design Performance // Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities, and Social Sciences, 2019, Vol. 43, pp. 577–590. 19. Kiefer Technic Showroom / Ernst Giselbrecht + Partner | ArchDaily [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 16]. Available from: https://www.archdaily.com/89270/kiefer-technic-showroom-ernst-giselbrecht-partner. 20. Nady, R. Dynamic facades: environmental control systems for sustainable design // Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development, 2017, Vol. 3, # 1, pp. 118–127. 21. El-Sheikh, M., Gerber, D. Building skin intelligence // Proceedings of ACADIA, 2011, pp. 170–177. 22. Augenbroe, G., Hensen, J. Simulation for better building design // Build Environment, 2004, Vol. 39, # 8, pp. 875–877. 23. Favoino, F., Doya, M., Loonen, R., Goia, F., Bedon, C., Babich, F. Building performance simulation and characterisation of adaptive facades–Adaptive Facade Network // TU Delft Open, 2018. 24. Wanas, A., Aly, S., Farghal, A., El-Dabaa, R. Use of kinetic facades to enhance daylighting performance in office buildings with emphasis on Egypt climate // Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2015, Vol. 62, # 1, pp. 339–361. 25. Sharaidin, K., Burry, J., Salim, F. Integration of digital simulation tools with parametric designs to evaluate kinetic facades for daylighting performance // Digital Physicality-Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe Conference, 2012, pp. 701–709. 26. Kizilorenli, E., Alakavuk, E. Examining the Daylighting Performance of Office Buildings on the Example of the Rectorate Building in Izmir // Light & Engineering, 2021, Vol. 29, # 6, pp. 53–8. 27. Elghazi, Y., Wagdy, A., Abdelwahab, S. Simulation Driven Design for Kinetic System: Optimize Kaleidocycle Facade Configuration for Daylighting Adequacy in Hot Arid Climates // 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2015, pp. 182–189. 28. Mahmoud, AHA., Elghazi, Y. Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylighting performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns // Solar Energy, 2016, Vol. 126, pp. 111–127. 29. El Sheikh, M., Kensek, K. Intelligent skins: Daylight harvesting through dynamic light-deflection in office spaces // En ARCC 2011 conference proceedings, 2011, pp. 293–304.
Keywords
- kinetic facade
- daylighting performance
- parametric daylighting simulation
- building performance
- Grasshopper
Recommended articles
The Evaluation of an Office Building According to LEED Certificate Lighting Criteria. L&E 27 (6) 2019
Examining the Daylighting Performance of Office Buildings on the Example of the Rectorate Building in Izmir L&E, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2021
Facade Optimization For An Education Building Using Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms Light & Engineering Vol. 28, No. 6