The use of sun shading elements frequently seen in the residential tradition of the Aegean region. Controllable traditional venetian blinds (shutters) carried to the present through periodic changes are prominent design elements of the architectural heritage. This study aims to understand the effectiveness of these traditional sun control elements in terms of energy efficiency in the cooling season within three different locations (north, mid, and south Aegean coast), and daylighting illuminance level adaptations in Izmir, mid Aegean coast area, with 2 different materials, and 3 different blind angles. To obtain data, on-site measurements conducted in the field of interest. The sunshade illuminance level measurements of the studied residential example used as a source for more effective use of IES (VE) energy models before testing further variations. The main objective is to comprehend one of the traditional methods of coping with the effect of the sun and to understand the reasons from a technical point of view for future adaptations. As a result of the analysis carried out on the most critical days of sunlight, the evaluation of solar shading elements in terms of daylighting balance and cooling loads in traditional houses, will provide us the understanding of the effect of sun control variations in the defined temperate climate region. Tested methodology will guide future case studies. 1. USGBC, 2008. Retrieved December 5, 2019 from https://new.usgbc.org/leed
2. Nitz, P., Buhler, C., Platzer, W., Kuhn, T., Gombert, A., Blasi, B. and Wittwer, V. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angewandten Forschung eV, 2006. Sun protection device having a plurality of segments that are oriented in parallel to one another // U.S. Patent Application 10/520,632.
3. Kim, Y.S., Lim, J.S., Hong, S.K., Kwun, J.B., Choi, A.S., Kim, Y.S. Luminous Characteristics of Shading Materials for Office Buildings: Perforated Panels vs. Fabric Blinds // LEUKOS, 2010, Vol. 6, # 3, pp. 227–240.
4. Kirimtat, A., Koyunbaba, B.K., Chatzikonstantinou, I., Sariyildiz, S. Review of Simulation Modelling for Shading Devices in Buildings // Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, # 53, pp. 23–49.
5. Shen, L., Han, Y. Optimizing the modular adaptive façade control strategy in open office space using integer programming and surrogate modelling // Energy and Buildings, 2022, # 254, 111546 p.
6. Schouenberg, B.B., Gkaintatzi-Masouti, M.M., Aarts, M.M., and Hornikx, M.M. Visualizing the daylight distribution for existing workspaces using a parametric simulation model: Indicating the best working position regarding visual performance, 2021.
7. Agirbas, A., Alakavuk, E. Facade optimization for an education building using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms // Light & Engineering, 2020, Vol. 28, # 6, pp. 41–50.
8. Shahbazi, Y., Heydari, M., Haghparast, F. An early-stage design optimization for office buildings’ façade providing high-energy performance and daylight // Indoor and Built Environment, 2019, Vol. 28, # 10, pp. 1350–67.
9. Hosseini, S.M., Mohammadi, M., Rosemann, A., Schröder, T., Lichtenberg, J. A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort // Building and Environment, 2019, Vol. 15, # 153, pp. 186–204.
10. Kirimtat, A., et al. Multi-objective optimization for shading devices in buildings by using evolutionary algorithms in Evolutionary Computation (CEC) // 2016 IEEE Congress on, 2016.
11. Bayram, G., Kazanasmaz, Z.T. Simulation-based retrofitting of an educational building in terms of optimum shading device and energy efficient artificial lighting criteria // Light & Engineering, 2016, Vol. 24, # 2, pp. 45–55.
12. Keskinel, Y., Ilal, M.E. Approaches to optimization for movable shading systems: a review of optimization methods and tools // Light & Engineering, 2021, Vol. 29, # 3, pp. 123–134.
13. Uygun, I.E., Kazanasmaz, T., Kale, S. An empirical validation of estimation model (optimlum) for energy efficient luminaire layout design in offices // Light & Engineering, 2020 Vol. 28, # 1, pp. 70–78.
14. Hammad, F., Abu-Hijleh, B. The Energy Savings Potential of Using Dynamic External Louvers in an Office Building // Energy and Buildings, 2010, Vol. 42, # 10, pp. 1888–1895.
15. Kim, J., Park, Y., Yeo, M., Kim, K. An Experimental Study on The Environmental Performance of The Automated Blind in Summer // Building and Environment, 2009, # 44, pp. 1517–1527.
16. Ochoa, C.E., Capeluto, I.G. Evaluating Visual Comfort and Performance of Three Natural Lighting Systems for Deep Office Buildings in Highly Luminous Climates // Building and Environment, 2006, Vol. 41, # 8, pp. 1128–1135.
17. Lee, E.S., DiBartolomeo, D.L., Selkowitz, S.E. Thermal and Daylighting Performance of an Automated Venetian Blind and Lighting System in a Full-scale Private Office // Energy and Buildings, 1998, Vol. 29, # 1, pp. 47–63.
18. Valladares-Rendón, L.G., Schmid, G., Lo, S.L. Review on Energy Savings by Solar Control Techniques and Optimal Building Orientation for The Strategic Placement of Facade Shading Systems // Energy and Buildings, 2017, # 140, pp. 458–479.
19. Pisello, A. Experimental Analysis of Cool Traditional Solar Shading Systems for Residential Buildings // Energies, 2015, Vol. 8, # 3, pp. 2197–2210.
20. Kim, G., Lim, H.S., Lim, T.S., Schaefer, L., Kim, J.T. Comparative Advantage of an Exterior Shading Device in Thermal Performance for Residential Buildings // Energy and buildings, 2012, # 46, pp. 105–111.
21. Hu, J., Olbina, S. Illuminance-Based Slat Angle Selection Model for Automated Control of Split Blinds // Building and Environment, 2011, Vol. 46, # 3, pp. 786–796.
22. Galasiu, A.D., Atif, M.R. Applicability of Daylighting Computer Modelling in Real Case Studies: Comparison between Measured and Simulated Daylight Availability and Lighting Consumption // Building and Environment, 2002, Vol. 37, # 4, pp. 363–377.
23. Attia, S. State of the art of existing early design simulation tools for net zero energy buildings: a comparison of ten tools // Architecture et climat, 2011. 24. IES VE Tutorial, 2018.
25. Mardaljevic, J., Andersen, M., Roy, N., Christoffersen, J. Daylighting Metrics: Is there a Relation Between Useful Daylight Illuminance and Daylight Glare Probabilty? // In Proceedings of The Building Simulation and Optimization Conference BSO12, Loughborough, UK, 2012.
26. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers CIBSE. Code for lighting. London, CIBSE, 2002
27. Licht, U.B. Lighting design, detail practice // Munich: Birkhauser, 2006.

• Previous article
• Next article

• shading device
• sun control
• energy efficiency
• daylighting
• illuminance measurement
• simulation