The review is devoted to the study of the internal radiation regime in the canopies cultivated under controlled environmental conditions. The expediency of using canopies as an object of research for evaluating the photobiological efficiency of radiation in light culture conditions is justified. The appropriateness of light measurements in multi-tiered canopies is shown, taking into account the role of leaves of different tiers in the formation of an economically useful crop. The main requirements for light devices for their use in measuring artificial radiation in light culture conditions are considered, and a brief analysis of the existing instrument base for performing these studies is given. A number of examples show the complexity and ambiguity of the internal structure of the light field that is forming within canopies in light culture conditions. Conceptual approaches to the choice of spectral and energy characteristics of artificial irradiation for plant light culture are proposed and justified. The necessity of taking into account the light conditions of leaves of different tiers when choosing the spectral and energy characteristics of light sources for the cultivation of multi-tiered canopies is justified. Techniques, methods, and light sources used for additional intracanopy lighting are analysed. The efficiency of using side illumination of plant canopies and conditions for its implementation are considered. The advantages of the volume distribution of canopies on the most common multi-tiered lighting installations are discussed. Based on the presented material, we consider ways to improve methodological approaches for evaluating the photobiological effectiveness of artificial radiation in light culture conditions for canopies of cultivated plants, taking into account the features of their architectonics and internal radiation regime. 1. Prikupets, L. B. LEDs in greenhouses: opportunities and reality// Light & Engineering, 2019, Vol. 27, # 6, pp. 9–14.
2. Murey I.A. The Speed of Plant Growth in Crops in the Case of Crowding [Skorost rosta rasteniy v posevakh pri ikh zagushchenii] // Fiziologiya rasteniy, 1974, Vol. 24, pp. 1265–1275.
3. Tikhomirov A.A., Lisovskiy G.M. Levels of Organisation of the Photosynthetic Apparatus and Control of the Production Process in Phytocenoses in Photoculture Environment [Urovni organizatsii fotosinteticheskogo apparata i upravleniye produktsionnym protsessom v fitotsnozakh v usloviyakh svetokultury] // Fiziologiya rasteniy, 2001. Vol. 48, # 3, pp. 461–466.
4. Tikhomirov A.A. Phytocenosis as a Biological Receiver of Optical Radiation [Fitotsenoz kak biologicheskiy priyomnik opticheskogo izlucheniya] // Svetotekhnika, 1998, Vol. 4, pp. 22–24.
5. Tikhomirov A.A., Lisovskiy G.M., Sidko F. Ya. Light Chromaticity and Plant Productivity [Spektralnyy sostav sveta i produktivnost rasteniy]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Siberian branch, 1991, 168 p.
6. Nichiporovich A.A. Photosynthesis and the High-Yielding Crop Theory [Fotosintez i teoriya polucheniya vysokikh urozhaev]. The 15th Timiryazev Conference. Moscow, The USSR Academy of Sciences press, 1956, 92 p.
7. Roos Yu.K. Radiation Mode and Architectonics of Plant Cover [Radiatsionnyi rezhim i arkhitektonika rastitelnogo pokrova]. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1975, 342 p.
8. Hikosaka, K.U. Niinemets, and N.P.R. Anten (eds.), Canopy Photosynthesis: From Basics to Applications. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2016.
9. TikhomirovA.A., Sid’ko F. Ya. Optical characterictics of individual plants elements and plant canopies grouth under radiationregimes of different spectralcomposition and intensity // Applied Optics, 1983, V.22, pp. 2874–2881.
10. V.P. Rvachyov. Methods of Light-Diffusing Media Optics in Physics and Biology [Metody optiki svetorasseivayushchikh sred v fizike i biologii, Minsk: V.I. Lening BGU press, 1978, 240 p.
11. Khazanov V.S. Current State of Biophysical Photometry [Biofizicheskaya fotometriya na sovremennom etape] // Svetotekhnika, 1980, Vol. 6, pp. 14–17.
12. Gulyaev B.I. Justificiation of the Ways of Increase of Photosynthetic Productivity of Crops [Obosnovaniye putey povysheniya fotosinteticheskoy produktivnosti posevov]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 218–222.
13. Yanishevskiy Yu.D. Actinometry Instruments and Observation Methods [Aktinometricheskiye pribory i metody nablyudeniy], Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1957, 415 p.
14. Kozyrev V.P. Photopyranometer / Inventor’s Certificate No. 317950. 1971. Bull. No. 31.
15. URL: https://labinstruments.su/upload/5e4bd3c12a398-li-cor-environmental-product-catalog-february‑2020.pdf (Date of reference: 18.11.2020).
16. Celina Go´mez and Cary A. Mitchell. Physiological and Productivity Responses of High-wire Tomato as Affected by Supplemental Light Source and Distribution within the Canopy. // J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2016, Vol. 141, pp. 196–208.
17. Xiangwei Gong, Uzizerimana Ferdinand, Ke Dang, Jing Li, Guanghua Chen, Yan Luo, Pu Yang, Baili Feng. Boosting proso millet yield by altering canopy light distribution in proso millet/mung bean intercropping systems // The Crop Journal, 2020, Vol. 8, pp. 365–377.
18. Karl-Johan Bergstranda, Leiv M. Mortensenb, Aruppillai Suthaparanb Hans Ragnar. Acclimatisation of greenhouse crops to differing light quality // Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, Vol. 204, pp. 1–7.
19. Elias Kaisera, Kees Weerheima, Rachel Schipperb, Janneke A. Dieleman. Partial replacement of red and blue by green light increases biomass and yield in tomato // Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, Vol. 249, pp. 271–279.
20. Gaby Deckmyn, Erwin Cayenberghs & Reinhart Ceulemans UV-B and PAR in single and mixed canopies grown under different UV-B exclusions in the field // Plant Ecology, 2001, Vol. 154, pp. 125–133.
21. Rozhdestvenskiy V.I., Kleshnin A.F. Controlled Cultivation of Plants in Artificial Environment [Upravlyaemoye kultivirovaniye rasteniy v iskusstvennoy srede]. Moscow: Nauka, 1980, 199 p.
22. McCree K.J. The action spectrum, absorption and yield of photosynthesis in crop plants// Agric. Meteorology, 1972, Vol. 9, pp. 192–216.
23. OST 46.140–83 of Ministry of Agriculture of the USSR. Optical Radiation. Assessment of Photosynthesis Efficiency. Terms and definitions. Moscow: MAC of USSR, 1983.
24. Tikhomirov, A A, Ushakova, S A, Shikhov V.N. Features Choice of Light Sources for Bio-Technical Life Support Systems for Space Applications // Light & Engineering, 2018, Vol. 26, #4, pp. 117–121.
25. Tikhomirov A.A., Zolotukhin I.G., Lisovskiy G.M., Sidko F. Ya. Specificity of Responses of Different Plant Species to PAR Chromaticity under Artificial Lighting [Spetsifika reaktsiy rasteniy razlichnykh vidov na spektralnyy sostav FAR pri iskusstvennom osveshchenii]/Fiziologiya rasteniy, 1987, Vol. 34, pp. 774–785.
26. Prikupets L.B., Boos G.V., Terekhov V.G., Tarakanov I.G. Research into Influence from Different Ranges of PAR Radiation on Efficiency and Biochemical Composition of Green Salad Foliage Biomass// Light & Engineering Journal, 2018, # 4, pp. 38–47.
27. Leonid B. Prikupets, George V. Boos, Vladislav G. Terekhov, and Tarakanov Ivan G. Optimisation of Lighting Parameters of Irradiation in Light Culture of Lettuce Plants Using LED Emitters// Light & Engineering Journal, 2019, Vol. 27, # 5, pp. 43–54.
28. Tikhomirov A.A., Sidko F. Ya. On Spectral Additivity of Biosynthetic Processes in Phytocenoses [K voprosu o spektralnoy additivnosti biosinteticheskih protsessov v fitotsenozakh] // Fiziologiya rasteniy, 1987, Vol. 34, pp. 39–50.
29. H.G. Tooming. Ecological Principles of Maximum Productivity of Crops [Ekologicheskiye printsipy maksimalnoy produktivnosti posevov]. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1984, 264 p.
30. Tikhomirov A.A. Photosynthesis of Cucumber Plants with Different PAR Chromaticity Radiation [Fotosintez rasteniy ogurtsa pri izluchenii razlichnogo spektralnogo sostava FAR] // Fiziologiya i biokhimiya kulturnykh rasteniy,1989, Vol. 21. Issue 1, pp. 3–8.
31. Jonathan M. Frantz, Robert J. Joly, and Cary A. Mitchell1Intracanopy Lighting Influences Radiation Capture, Productivity, and Leaf Senescence in Cowpea Canopies // J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2000, Vol. 1, pp. 694–701.
32. Tikhomirov A.A., Sharulich V.P., Lisovskiy G.M. Plant Photoculture: Biophysical and Biotechnological Basics [Svetokultura rasteniy: biofizicheskiye i biotekhnologicheskiye osnovy]. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences Press, 2000, 213 p.
33. Rolf I. Pettersen, Sissel Torre, Hans R. Gislerød. Effects of intracanopy lighting on photosynthetic characteristics in cucumber // Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, Vol. 125, pp. 77–81.
34. Celina Go´mez, Robert C. Morrow, C. Michael Bourget, Gioia D. Massa, and Cary A. Mitchell. Comparison of Intracanopy Light-emitting Diode Towers and Overhead High-pressure Sodium Lamps for Supplemental Lighting of Greenhouse-grown Tomatoes // Hort Technology, 2013, Vol. 23, pp. 93–98.
35. Julienne Fanwouaa, Gilles Vercambrea, Gerhard Buck-Sorlinb, J. Anja Dielemanc, Pieter de Visserc, Michel Génard. Supplemental LED lighting affects the dynamics of tomato fruit growth and composition // Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, Vol. 256, p. 108571.
36. Dionysios Touliatos, Ian C. Dodd & Martin McAinsh. Vertical farming increases lettuce yield per unit area compared to conventional horizontal hydroponics // Food and Energy Security, 2016, Vol. 5, pp. 184–191.
37. Chub V.V., Mironova O. Yu. Light Absorption by Plants and Bioactive Molecules// Light & Engineering, 2019, Vol. 27, Special Issue, pp. 15–23.
38. Elias Kaiser, Kees Weerheim, Rachel Schipperb, Janneke A. Dieleman. Partial replacement of red and blue by green light increases biomass and yield in tomato // Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, Vol. 249, pp. 271–279.
39. Woo Hyun Kang, Jong Seok Park, Kyung Sub Park, and Jung Eek Son. Leaf Photosynthetic Rate, Growth, and Morphology of Lettuce under Different Fractions of Red, Blue, and Green Light from Light-Emitting Diodes// LEDs. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol, 2016, Vol. 57, pp. 573–579.
40. Qingwu Meng, Jennifer Boldt, Erik S. Runkle. Blue Radiation Interacts with Green Radiation to Influence Growth and Predominantly Controls Quality Attributes of Lettuce. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 2020, Vol. 145, pp. 75–87.
41. Trouwborst, G., J. Oosterkamp, S.W. Hogewoning, J. Harbinson, and W. Van Ieperen.. The responses of light interception, photosynthesis and fruit yield of cucumber to LED-lighting within the canopy // Physiol. Plant// 2010, Vol. 138, pp. 289–300.
42. Yunze Shen, Shuangsheng Guo, Gu Zeng. Effects of a new-type inner-canopy illuminant and light quality on spring wheat growth in CELSS // Acta Astronautica, 2020, Vol. 166, pp. 131–136.
43. Qingwu Meng, Erik S. Runkle. Far-red radiation interacts with relative and absolute blue and red photon flux densities to regulate growth, morphology, and pigmentation of lettuce and basil seedlings// Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, Vol. 255, pp. 269–280.
44. Alexander A. Tikhomirov, Sofya A. Ushakova, Valentin N. Shikhov, Shklavtsova Ekaterina S. Conceptual Approach to Selecting Radiation Spectrum of Lamps for Plant Cultivation // Light & Engineering, 2019, Vol. 27. Special Issue, pp. 24–30.

• Previous article
• Next article

• plant light culture
• intracanopy lighting
• light sources
• canopy architectonics
• optical
• canopy properties
• canopy productivity