Abstract:Just as any other interior environment, lighting of exhibition spaces must be examined to enhance its visual quality and comfort. In this study, user behaviour, perception and impressions are analyzed for more comprehensive understanding by including subjective reasoning. Due to the chaotic progress and contradictory choices in exhibition lighting, daylight is mostly avoided while the role of users and relation between quantitative and qualitative parameters are often neglected. A series of sample exhibition spaces illuminated either artificially or by daylight are modelled virtually in Lumion software to be evaluated in a three-step questionnaire. A total of 90 participants are selected from three different professions (architects, visitors, artists), their reaction like movement, preference and impressions are gathered via questionnaire while moving through the model. The study aims to find out the role of lighting type in exhibition navigation and its relation with non-lighting parameters using statistical analysis methods. Results show that natural light is preferred more in sculpture exhibition while artificial light is preferred in painting exhibition. Movement towards daylight increases in transition areas and towards the end of the exhibition. A significant difference in navigation choices are found between professions, architects preferred to move towards more natural light while artists preferred artificial light.
References:1. Cuttle, C. Light for Art’s Sake Lighting for Artworks and Museum Displays (1st ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007. 2. Garside, D., Curran, K., Korenberg, C., MacDonald, L., Teunissen, K., & Robson, S. How is museum lighting selected? An insight into current practice in UK museums// Journal of the Institute of Conservation, 2017, Vol.40, #1, pp.3–14. 3. Ajmat, R., Sandoval, J., Arana Sema, F., O’Donell, B., Gor, S., & Alonso, H. Lighting design in museums: Exhibition vs. preservation// WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 2011, # 118, pp. 195–206. 4. Druzik, J. R., & Eshoj, B. Museum lighting: its past and future development. Museum Microclimates, 2007, pp. 51–56. 5. Kesner, C.W. Analysis of the museum lighting environment// Journal of Interior Design, 1997, Vol. 23, #2, pp. 28–41. 6. Thomson, G. The Museum Environment. Butterworths-Heinemann (2nd ed.). London, 1986. 7. Cannon-Brookes, S. Daylighting galleries: performance criteria// Lighting Research and Technology, 2000, Vol.32, #3, pp. 161–168. 8. Kim, C. S., & Chung, S.J. Daylighting simulation as an architectural design process in museums installed with top-lights// Building and Environment, 2011, Vol.46, #1, pp. 210–222. 9. Blake, S., Hall, J., & Sissel, S. Using Lighting to Enhance Wayfinding, 2010. 10. Şener Yılmaz, F. (2018). Human factors in retail lighting design: an experimental subjective evaluation for sales areas//Architectural Science Review, 2010, Vol.61, #3, pp.156–170. 11. Fördergemeinschaft Gutes Licht. Good Lighting for Museums, Galleries and Exhibitions// In Information on Lighting Applications, Frankfurt: Fördergemeinschaft Gutes Licht, 2007, p.48. 12. Haans, A. The Natural Preference in People’s Appraisal of Light// Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, #39, pp. 51–61.
An Empirical Validation of Estimation Model (OptimLUM) for Energy Efficient Luminaire Layout Design in Offices L&E 28 (1) 2020
Illuminance and Luminance Based Ratios in the Scope of Performance Testing of a Light Shelf-Reflective Louver System in a Library Reading Room. L&E 27 (3) 2019
Applicability of a Prismatic Panel to Optimize Window Size and Depth of a South-facing Room for a Better Daylight Performance. L&E 28 (4) 2020