Light & Engineering 26 (3)

Volume 26
Date of publication 09/28/2018
Pages 124-131

Comfort Light Environment under Natural and Combined Lighting Method of Their Characteristics Definition with Subjective Expert Appraisal Using. L&E 26 (3) 2018

Articles authors:

Nina A. Muraviova, Alexei K. Soloviev, Sergei V. Stetsky

Ph.D. in technical sciences, graduated from NRU MGSU in 2012. At present time, she is employee of the retail company X5 Retail Group

Prof., Dr. of technical sciences. He graduated in 1965 from Moscow Institute named after V.V. Kuibyshev. At present, he is the Professor of the department “Design of buildings and structures” (former department of “Architecture of civil and industrial buildings”) of the NRU “MGSU”. He is a Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts and the editorial board of the “Lighting Engineering” and “Svetotekhnika”, has the titles of “Honorary Builder of the Russian Federation” and “Honoured Worker of the Higher School of Russia”

Ph.D. in technical sciences, Associate Professor, graduated from Moscow Institute named after V.V. Kuibyshev in 1970. At present, he is an Associate Professor at the chair “Design of Buildings and Structures” (former department of “Architecture of Civil and Industrial Buildings”) NRU “MGSU”

Abstract

Light comfort in the room is characterized by the conditions of visual work, which are determined by the levels of illumination of the workplace and the saturation of the entire room with light. The related problems were solved mainly for artificial illumination. The article examines the results of research in our country and abroad by determining the criterion for the comfort of lighting rooms with artificial and natural light. It is pointed out that such studies are obviously insufficient, and suggestions are given on their development.

References

1. Goncharov N.N., Kireev N.N. Visual performance under natural and artificial light. // Svetotechnika, 1977, № 9. pp. 5–8.
2. Van den Böld G. Light and health / / Svetotechnika, 2003, № 1. pp. 4–8.
3. R.G. Hopkinson and J. Longmore. The permanent supplementary artificial lighting of interiors // Trans. Illuminat. Engineering Society, 1959, 24 (3), 121 p.
4. R.G. Hopkinson. Architectural physics: Lighting. HMSO, 1963.
5. Gusev N.M., Kireev N.N. Lighting of industrial buildings. M. Stroiizdat. 1968. 160p.
6. Semenikhin N.I. Subjective assessment of the quality of lighting installations of reflected light. // NIISF. Proceedings of the Institute// Building Lighting Engineering, Issue 13, 1975.
7. Stetsky S.V., Lobatovkina Ye.G. Perfection of the method of subjective expert evaluation of the factors of the internal microclimate // Industrial and civil construction, 2013 № 12, pp 69–72.
8. Yurov S.G. Some question of the metrics and methods of expert subjective assessments of psychoesthetic parameters of the ligtcolor environment. // Svetotechnika, 1974, № 9, pp.2–4.
9. Irens A.N. Light and Productivity /Transactions of Illuminating Engineering Society (London), 1960, V. 25, No.2, pp.53–68.
10. Manning P. Lighting in Relation to other Components of the total Environment/ Transactions of Illuminating Engineering Society (London), 1968, V.33, No.4,. pp.159–168.
11. Bodmann H.V. Light and total Energy Input to a Building. // Light and Lighting, September 1970, pp.240–245.
12. Ne’eman E., Hopkinson R.G. Critical minimum acceptable Window Sice: A Study of Window Design and Provision of a View. // Lighting Research and Technology, 1970, V.2, No.1, pp.17–27.
13. Lay S.D. Appraisal of the visual Environment. // IES Lighting Review, October 1970, pp.129–138.
14. Cockram A.H., Collins J.B. A study of User Preferences for fluorescent Lamp Colors for Daytime and Nighttime Lighting. // Lighting Research and Technology, 1970, V.2, No.4,. pp.249–256.
15. Solovyov AK, Stetsky S.V. Creating a comfortable light environment in classrooms. // Collection of special and scientific works of the Polytechnic Institute of Brno (Czechoslovakia), 1979, pp. 113–124.
16. Stetsky S.V. Subjective appraisal of the quality parameters of combined lighting. // Architectural education. Intercollegiate collection of the Moscow Architectural Institute, 1979, 206p.
17. Solovyov AK, Stetsky S.V. Determination of the parameters of combined lighting by subjective appraisal of the light environment in the premises. // Designing and scientific research. M. Stroiizdat, 1984, № 6, pp 36–38.
18. Stetsky S.V., Porublev S.A. Subjective appraisal of the light environment in the work shops of small auto repair enterprises for the climatic conditions of the North Caucasus. // Industrial and civil construction, 2011, № 1, pp 46–48.
19. Soloviev A.K. Die Anvendung der Lichtfeldtheorie bei der Projektierung der Beleuchtung von Arbeitstaetten. // Licht, 1996, № 5.
20. Helson H. Adaptation Level Theory: An experimental and Systematic Approach to Bechavior. // Harper and Row, USA, 1974, 732 p.
21. Report of the ICE No. 19. “A recommended method for appraisal aspects of lighting associated with visual perception.” Washington – London. 1971.
22. Study of performance and fatigue under various lighting conditions. // Publication of the Society for the Study of Light. Lichttechnik. 1965, No.8.
23. Lakin G.F. Biometrics. Moscow, High school, 1973.
24. Bardin K.V. The problem of sensitivity thresholds and psychophysical methods, Moscow, Science. 1976.
25. Leontyev P.D. Statistical processing of measurement results, Moscow, Goslesbumizdat, 1952.
26. Muraviova N. A, Soloviev A.K. Investigations of the nature of the distribution of natural cylindrical illumination in rooms with side natural illumination // Svetotechnika, 2015, № 6, pp. 27–30

Keywords