Content
Abstract:
A new approach to the formulation of an illumination quality criterion based on an analysis of spatial-angular luminance distribution and of the properties of human sight is considered in this article. As part of the research, an experimental installation was developed to determine comfort and discomfort areas, which are inseparable from an assessment of illumination quality. A method for computer simulation of spatial-angular luminance distribution, based on local evaluations Monte-Carlo method is shown, which in future can facilitate moving from a preset illuminance distribution simulation to a preset quality simulation.
References:
1. Budak, V., Zheltov, V., Notfulin, R., Chembaev, V. Relation of Instant Radiosity Method with Local Estimations of Monte Carlo Method // WSCG. 2016, pp. 189–197. 2. Kajiya, J.T. The rendering equation // Computer Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH’86). 1986, V. 20, #. 4, pp. 143–150. 3. Luckiesh, M., Guth, S.K. Brightness in the visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort // Illuminating Engineering. 1949, V.44, #. 11, pp. 650–670. 4. Wout Van Bommel, V. Lighting Tomorrow: What’s Hot? // Light & Engineering, 2010, #2, V.18, pp.5–9. 5. Hopkinson, R.G. Evaluation of Glare // Illuminating Engineering. 1957.V. 52, #. 6, pp. 305–321. 6. Scheir, G.H., Hanselaer, P., Bracke, P., Deconinck, G., Ryckaert, W. Calculation of the Unified Glare Rating based on luminance maps for uniform and non-uniform light sources // Building and Environment. 2015, V.84, pp. 60–67. 7. Lombardo, M., Lombardo, G., Lomoriello, D.S., Ducoli, P., Stirpe, M., Serrao, S. Interocular symmetry of parafoveal photoreceptor cone density distribution // Retina. 2013, V. 33, #8, pp. 1640–1649. 8. Larson, G.W. et al. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes // IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.1997, V.3, # 4, pp. 291–306. 9. Goral, C., Torrance, K.E., Greenberg, D.P., Battaile, B. Modeling the interaction of light between diffuse surfaces // Computer Graphics. 1984. V. 18, No. 3, pp. 213–222. 10. Christensen, N. J., Jensen, H. W. A Practical Guide to Global illumination and Photon Maps // Proc. SIGGRAPH, 2000. 11. Kalos, M.H. On the Estimation of Flux at a Point by Monte Carlo // Nuclear Science and Engineering. 1963, V.16, No.1, pp. 111–117. 12. Monte-Carlo method in atmospheric optics / Under the editorship of G.I. Marchuk. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1976. 13. Phong Bui Tuong. Illumination for Computer Generated Pictures // CACM. 1975, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 311–317. 14. Keller, A. Instant radiosity // Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1997. P. 49–56. 15. Batyrshin I.Z. Main operations of fuzzy logic and their generalisations. Kazan: Otechestvo, 2001, 102 p.
Keywords
- local evaluations of Monte-Carlo method
- spatial-angular luminance distribution
- discomfort
- illumination quality criterion
Recommended articles
A Model for Evaluating the Visual Perception of an Arbitrary Distribution of Luminance in Indoor Lighting Installations L&E, Vol.31, No.3, 2023
Luminance Factor Modelling For An Arbitrary Surface L&E, Vol.30, No.2, 2022
Evaluation of Lighting Quality Based On Visibility L&E, Vol.31, No.4, 2023